SUPREME COURT OF INDIA VENAGRO & ORS. – Petitioner(s) Versus INCRED FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD (ERSTRWHILE KNOWN AS VISU LEASING FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED) – Respondent(s) Transfer Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s).68/2024 (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.19156/2024-EX-PARTE STAY ) WITH Transfer Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s).66/2024 (II) (Item No. 1619) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.17897/2024-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.17898/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. )…
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
[SC] CPC O. 39 R. 1 - When a mandatory injunction is granted at the interim stage much more than a mere prima facie case has to be made out - Revisional jurisdiction under section 115 CPC is to be exercised to correct jurisdictional errors only - CPC S. 115 [ ID# 3310205]
CONTEMPT | Court deems it fit and appropriate to issue a show cause notice upon the Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Chandigarh, for the latter making an explanation to this Court as to why proceedings for contempt be not initiated against him for his making the above miscommunication, which but is prima facie completely ridden with lies. [PLRonline.in]
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – S. 138 – Loan agreement executed at Hyderabad – Cheque was issued at Hyderabad – Respondent/Complainant Financial institutions have their offices at Hyderabad – Entire cause of action for filing the present complaints under S. 138 has accrued at Hyderabad – Yet the complaint has been submitted before the Court at Calcutta, Jaipur and Gurugram only to harass the petitioners – Stay of further proceedings. [#PLRonline]
0
