- Judges must know their limits.
- If the legislature or the executive are not functioning properly, remedy is not in the judiciary taking over the legislative or executive functions
- Judicial adventurism – Courts cannot “create rights” where none exists nor can they go on making orders which are incapable of enforcement or violative of other laws or settled legal principles.
- If there is a law, Judges can certainly enforce it, but Judges cannot create a law and seek to enforce it.
- Judicial restraint in administrative action
- Judicial ‘over-reach’ and encroachment into the domain of the other two organs.
- iIf the judiciary does not exercise restraint and over-stretches its limits there is bound to be a reaction from politicians – The politicians will then step in and curtail the powers, or even the independence, of the judiciary
- Judges must restrain themselves from the areas reserved to the other separate branches
- Judicial restraint – It is time to reiterate that public officers should not be called to court unnecessarily
- Judicial restraint – Practice of summoning officers , deprecated
- Latest
