Merely because the petitioner has not been tried by the Force Court, it will not mitigate the gravity of allegations of wilful absence

Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Rules 1994 – The petitioner had approached the respondents by way of filing an appeal after the passing of the dismissal order – In consequence of the passing of the dismissal order, the petitioner ceased to be a member of force – Moreover, the proceedings before the departmental authorities and the Force Court are distinct and separate – Merely because the petitioner has not been tried by the Force Court, it will not mitigate the gravity of allegations of wilful absence from duty and exonerate him from the liability to face consequences in the departmental proceedings. (201) PLR 142

Download / Print

Tags: Absence from duty - Service

Merely because the petitioner has not been tried by the Force Court, it will not mitigate the gravity of allegations of wilful absence

IPC S. 34 – Common Intention – Can be formed even in the course of the incident – Would come into play where participation of the accused in a crime is proved and the common intention is also established. [PLRonline 482604]

Consumer Protection Act – Stocks and shares – Invesment in – Complainant is not a Consumer – It is not the case of the Complainant that he had invested the money in share market exclusively for earning his livelihood. [2022 PLRonline 0596 (NCDRC)]

NIA S. 138 – Liability of Joint Account Holders – There is no provision for taking cognizance against a person other than the “drawer” of the cheque. [(2023-4)212 PLR 177]

Court proceedings – Videography – Whether would amount to criminal contempt of court ? [(2023-4)212 PLR 163]

Court proceedings – Videography – Court proceedings in the High Court or any other Court subordinate thereto cannot be videotaped, photographed or telecast without taking prior written permission from the High Court. [PLRonline]

NDPS S. 2 (viia) read with the notification S.O. No. 1055 (E) dated 19/10/2001 , Section 37, 52A – “commercial quantity” – Weight Adjustment due to Drying – Weight recorded during inventory before the Magistrate considered – Bail Consideration for Multiple Accused. [PLRonline 413680]

[SC] CPC O. 7 R. 11 – Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Order 7 Rule 11 – Assessment of Plaints – Court should not engage in assessing the correctness or merits of the plaint’s averments – Court made an error by partially rejecting the plaint . [PLRonline 416680]

[SC] Insurance – Surveyor’s report – Not relied – Reliance by surveyor on forensic report – Claim payable.

[SC] Insurance – Surveyor’s report, though important, is not absolute and not binding on the parties – It is not that sacrosanct that it cannot be departed from; it is not conclusive. [ PLRonline 368351]

IT Act S. 67(A) – Posted on Instagram 4-5 pictures of petitioner kissing the complainant on her cheek – Bail granted. [2022 PLRonline 0595]

As the promotions in were made in clear violation of the Rules, the promotees are not entitled to claim seniority

Appointment - Change in Category from what was mentioned in the form uploaded to another

Merely because the petitioner has not been tried by the Force Court, it will not mitigate the gravity of allegations of wilful absence

Related Posts

Service Matter – Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Offices Ministerial Group “C” Posts of the Lowest Grade (Recruitment by Promotion) Rules, 2001 – Promotion. [ 2023 SCeJ 0336]

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Welcome Back!

Create New Account!

Retrieve your password

Save PLRonline.in APP!