M. Venkata Mani Kanthu v. Unknown , 2005 PLRonline 0005 (Andh.)

Download / Print Andhra High Court Bench: D Varma, G Rohini M. Venkata Mani Kanthu v. Unknown 10 August, 2005 JUDGMENT S.R. Varma, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. 2 This appeal is directed against the order, dated 27th June 2005, passed by the III Additional District Judge, Tirupathi, in Guardian...

P & H High Court judgment : requires you to be logged in with PLRonline.in / Punjab Law Reporter subscription.SUPREME COURT judgment : requires you to be logged in with SUPREMECOURTonline.in / Supreme Court e@Journal subscription.This content is for Punjab Law Reporter (subscribers-only) and Supreme Court e@Journal - (subscribers only - 1 calendar year) members only.
Login Join NowFull text Judgments is for members only.
JOIN TRIAL MEMBERSHIP or email at plr@plronline.in or call 9463598502Trial membership : Full site 21 daysPunjab Law Reporter subscribers (@Rs 3400/- for 2022) : 1 year subscription to PLR ( monthly parts) + SCe@Journal Subscription 2023 + Full site subscription for www.SupremeCourtonline.in (BEST OFFER !!! you save 1900/-))Supreme Court E@Journal (@Rs 1500/- for 2023) : 1 year subscription to SCe@Journal Subscription 2023 + subscription for www.SupremeCourtonline.in ( except Punjab Law Reporter reported cases)

No tags for this post.

M. Venkata Mani Kanthu v. Unknown , 2005 PLRonline 0005 (Andh.)

HMA – COI Art. 142 – Transfer Petition – Irretrievable breakdown of marriage – Mutual consent divorce granted. [2023 SCeJ 0234]

Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 28 – Lambardar – Appointment of – Age – Is a relevant factor . [PLRonline 119102]

Execution – Limitation – Filed after 12 years.. [PLRonline 114800]

IPC – Grevious hurt – The injuries were not intended to cause death but were sufficient to cause grievous injury. It was not a premeditated act – The scissors used by the appellant were little scissors used by tailors. [2023 PLRonline 0100]

Inference – Adverse inference

CPC S. 24 – Cardinal principle for exercise of power under S. 24 is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer. (2022-4)208 PLR 512 (SC), 2023 SCeJ 0223

IPC S. 149 – When five persons were specifically named in the FIR and five persons are facing the trial may be separately, Section 149 IPC would be attracted – FIR- Delay of 3 ½ days – Properly explained. [2023 SupremeCourtOnline 0009]

Chennai City Police Act, 1888 – Police Act, 1861 [2023 PLRonline 9003]

DNA – Evidentiary value of blood tests for determining paternity

Hindu Law – Joint Family Property – Alienation of – Where an alienation is not made with the consent of all the coparceners, it is voidable at the instance of the coparceners whose consent has not been obtained

Baidnath Mahto v. Jadu Mahto @ Jadunandan Mahato , 2004 PLRonline 90001 (Jhar.)

M. Venkata Mani Kanthu v. Unknown , 2005 PLRonline 0005 (Andh.)

Related Posts

ARUL DANIEL v. SUGANYA, 2022 PLRonline 0490 (Mad.), (2022-4)208 PLRIJ 0033 (Mad.) (FB)

RAVINDER NATH SAHNI V. PODDAR CONSTRUCTION CO. PRIVATE LIMITED, 2014 PLRonline 0109 (Del.)

Silvertoe Mfg. Co. Of India v. Usha Soi, 1994 PLRonline 0006 (Del.)

Welcome Back!

Create New Account!

Retrieve your password

Save PLRonline.in APP!