Download / Print Jharkhand High Court Bench: V Narayan Baidnath Mahto v. Jadu Mahto @ Jadunandan Mahato 29 April, 2004 JUDGMENT Vishnudeo Narayan, J. 1. This appeal at the instance of the plaintiffs-appellant has been preferred against the impugned judgment and decree dated 28.1.1989 and 9.2.1989 respectively passed in Title Appeal No. 38 of 1984...
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
M. Venkata Mani Kanthu v. Unknown , 2005 PLRonline 0005 (Andh.)
HMG S. 8 - Permission to sell immovable properties - Share of the minors in the two properties is quite negligible and agreement to sell have already been entered into and land of the minors would be sold along with the share of the appellant in the said land
Baidnath Mahto v. Jadu Mahto @ Jadunandan Mahato , 2004 PLRonline 90001 (Jhar.)
0
