• Latest

Union Bank of India v. Vee Jay Enterprises, 2014 PLRonline 5742

SC/ST Act – For offence to be constituted, there must be an allegation that the accused not being a member of Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe committed an offence under the IPC punishable for a term of 10 years or more against a member of the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe knowing that such person belongs to such `community’. [PLRonline #497684]

IPC S. 34 – Common Intention – Can be formed even in the course of the incident – Would come into play where participation of the accused in a crime is proved and the common intention is also established. [PLRonline 482604]

Consumer Protection Act – Stocks and shares – Invesment in – Complainant is not a Consumer – It is not the case of the Complainant that he had invested the money in share market exclusively for earning his livelihood. [2022 PLRonline 0596 (NCDRC)]

NIA S. 138 – Liability of Joint Account Holders – There is no provision for taking cognizance against a person other than the “drawer” of the cheque. [(2023-4)212 PLR 177]

Court proceedings – Videography – Whether would amount to criminal contempt of court ? [(2023-4)212 PLR 163]

MVA – Criminal case  – Acquittal in a criminal case – Effect on claim petition

Court proceedings –  Videography –  Court proceedings in the High Court or any other Court subordinate thereto cannot be videotaped, photographed or telecast without taking prior written permission from the High Court. [PLRonline]

NDPS S. 2 (viia)  read with the notification S.O. No. 1055 (E) dated 19/10/2001 , Section 37, 52A –  “commercial quantity” – Weight Adjustment due to Drying – Weight recorded during inventory before the Magistrate considered – Bail Consideration for Multiple Accused. [PLRonline 413680]

[SC] CPC O. 7 R. 11 – Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Order 7 Rule 11 – Assessment of Plaints – Court should not engage in assessing the correctness or merits of the plaint’s averments – Court made an error by partially rejecting the plaint . [PLRonline 416680]

[SC] Insurance  –  Surveyor’s report – Not relied – Reliance by surveyor on forensic report – Claim payable.

[SC] Insurance – Surveyor’s report, though important, is not absolute and not binding on the parties – It is not that sacrosanct that it cannot be departed from; it is not conclusive. [ PLRonline 368351]

IT Act S. 67(A)   – Posted on Instagram 4-5 pictures of petitioner kissing the complainant on her cheek – Bail granted. [2022 PLRonline 0595]

Insurance – Mediclaim policy – Pre existing disease  – Non-disclosure – Burden of  proof – Prescription – Mere mentioning in the prescription would not amount to establishing a concealment – Senior Citizens policy – Pre-medical check-up – Having opted to waive of was thus conscious – Insurer liable. [PLRonline # 446681]

  • Membership Account
  • LATEST
  • P&H
  • CIVIL
  • CPC
  • CRIMINAL
  • COI
  • SERVICE
  • ARB
  • BANKING
  • CONS
  • HMA
  • IBC
  • MVA
  • NIA
  • Tenancy
  • Login
  • Register
PLRonline.in
Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • A
    • A
    • Account
    • Admission
    • Adoption
    • Advocate
    • Agreement
    • Alternate Remedy
    • Annual Confidential Reports (ACR)
    • Arbitration Act, 1940
    • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
  • B
    • B
    • Bail
    • Banking
      • Bank Guarantee
  • C
    • C
    • Charge / Charge Sheet
    • CPC
      • CPC – Sections
      • CPC – Orders and Rules
    • Commercial Courts Act, 2015
    • Companies Act
    • Constitution of India
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Contempt of Courts Act, 1971
    • Contract Act
    • Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970
    • Court
    • Court Fees Act, 1870
    • Criminal Trial
      • Charge / Charge Sheet
    • CrPC (Criminal Procedure Code)
    • Customs Act, 1962
  • D
    • D
    • Disciplinary Proceedings
    • Dying Declaration
  • E
    • E
    • East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949
    • Electricity Act, 2003 (36 of 2003)
    • Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (8 of 1923),
    • Evidence
    • Evidence Act, 1872
  • F
    • F
    • Family Courts Act, 1984
    • FIR ( First Information Report)
  • G
    • G
    • Genealogy
    • General Clauses Act, 1897
  • H
    • H
    • Habeas Corpus
    • Handwriting expert
    • Haryana Acts
      • Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 (24 of 1973)
      • Haryana Municipal Election Rules, 1978
      • Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act 1973
    • Hindu Joint Family
    • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
  • I
    • I
    • IBC – Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
    • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
    • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
    • Information Technology Act
    • Insurance
    • Interpretation
    • Interpretation of Statutes
    • IPC
  • J
    • J
    • Judgment and Orders
    • Judicial Restraint / Judicial Adventurism
  • L
    • L
    • Land Acquisition Act, 1894
    • Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987
    • Limitation Act, 1963
  • M
    • M
    • Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act
    • Marriage
    • Maternity Benefit Act, 1961
    • Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises Development Act (MSME, Act)
    • Mortgage
    • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
    • Mutation
  • N
    • N
    • Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS)
    • National Highway Act, 1956
    • Natural Justice
    • Negotiable Instruments Act (NIA)
  • O
    • O
  • P
    • P
    • Punjab Acts / Rules etc.
      • East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949
      • Punjab Jail Manual
      • Punjab Police Rules, 1934
      • Punjab Regional And Town Planning And Development Act, 1995
      • Punjab State Agriculture Produce Markets Act, 1961
      • Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922
      • Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961
    • Partnership Act, 1932
    • Passports Act, 1967
    • Pay fixation
    • Pedigree
    • Pension
    • Perjury
    • Practice and Procedure
    • Prevention of Corruption Act
    • Principle of estoppel or acquiescence
    • Prisons Act, 1894
    • Proclaimed offender
    • Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988
  • R
    • R
    • RERA
    • Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993
    • Registration Act, 1908
    • Representation of the People Act, , 1951
  • S
    • S
    • Sale of Goods Act
    • Sarfaesi
    • Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
    • Service Matters
    • Service of orders on a government servant
    • Sexual Offence
    • Special Marriage Act, 1954
    • Specific Performance
    • Specific Relief Act, 1963
    • Stamp Act, 1899
    • Stamp duty
    • Stay
    • Suit for declaration / possession
    • Succession Act
    • Suit for recovery of Money
  • T
    • T
    • Tenancy and Rent Act
      • East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949
      • Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act 1973
    • Trade Unions Act
    • Transfer of Property Act, 1882
  • V
    • Voice recording
  • W
    • Wakf Act, 1955
    • Words and Phrases
  • Log In
  • Home
  • A
    • A
    • Account
    • Admission
    • Adoption
    • Advocate
    • Agreement
    • Alternate Remedy
    • Annual Confidential Reports (ACR)
    • Arbitration Act, 1940
    • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
  • B
    • B
    • Bail
    • Banking
      • Bank Guarantee
  • C
    • C
    • Charge / Charge Sheet
    • CPC
      • CPC – Sections
      • CPC – Orders and Rules
    • Commercial Courts Act, 2015
    • Companies Act
    • Constitution of India
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Contempt of Courts Act, 1971
    • Contract Act
    • Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970
    • Court
    • Court Fees Act, 1870
    • Criminal Trial
      • Charge / Charge Sheet
    • CrPC (Criminal Procedure Code)
    • Customs Act, 1962
  • D
    • D
    • Disciplinary Proceedings
    • Dying Declaration
  • E
    • E
    • East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949
    • Electricity Act, 2003 (36 of 2003)
    • Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (8 of 1923),
    • Evidence
    • Evidence Act, 1872
  • F
    • F
    • Family Courts Act, 1984
    • FIR ( First Information Report)
  • G
    • G
    • Genealogy
    • General Clauses Act, 1897
  • H
    • H
    • Habeas Corpus
    • Handwriting expert
    • Haryana Acts
      • Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 (24 of 1973)
      • Haryana Municipal Election Rules, 1978
      • Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act 1973
    • Hindu Joint Family
    • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
  • I
    • I
    • IBC – Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
    • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
    • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
    • Information Technology Act
    • Insurance
    • Interpretation
    • Interpretation of Statutes
    • IPC
  • J
    • J
    • Judgment and Orders
    • Judicial Restraint / Judicial Adventurism
  • L
    • L
    • Land Acquisition Act, 1894
    • Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987
    • Limitation Act, 1963
  • M
    • M
    • Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act
    • Marriage
    • Maternity Benefit Act, 1961
    • Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises Development Act (MSME, Act)
    • Mortgage
    • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
    • Mutation
  • N
    • N
    • Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS)
    • National Highway Act, 1956
    • Natural Justice
    • Negotiable Instruments Act (NIA)
  • O
    • O
  • P
    • P
    • Punjab Acts / Rules etc.
      • East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949
      • Punjab Jail Manual
      • Punjab Police Rules, 1934
      • Punjab Regional And Town Planning And Development Act, 1995
      • Punjab State Agriculture Produce Markets Act, 1961
      • Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922
      • Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961
    • Partnership Act, 1932
    • Passports Act, 1967
    • Pay fixation
    • Pedigree
    • Pension
    • Perjury
    • Practice and Procedure
    • Prevention of Corruption Act
    • Principle of estoppel or acquiescence
    • Prisons Act, 1894
    • Proclaimed offender
    • Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988
  • R
    • R
    • RERA
    • Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993
    • Registration Act, 1908
    • Representation of the People Act, , 1951
  • S
    • S
    • Sale of Goods Act
    • Sarfaesi
    • Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
    • Service Matters
    • Service of orders on a government servant
    • Sexual Offence
    • Special Marriage Act, 1954
    • Specific Performance
    • Specific Relief Act, 1963
    • Stamp Act, 1899
    • Stamp duty
    • Stay
    • Suit for declaration / possession
    • Succession Act
    • Suit for recovery of Money
  • T
    • T
    • Tenancy and Rent Act
      • East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949
      • Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act 1973
    • Trade Unions Act
    • Transfer of Property Act, 1882
  • V
    • Voice recording
  • W
    • Wakf Act, 1955
    • Words and Phrases
Subscribe
PLRonline.in

Power of Attorney

Barack Obama's Now Mainly Focusing on Wearing This Casual Backwards Hat

Home Various Acts

Union Bank of India v. Vee Jay Enterprises, 2014 PLRonline 5742

by PLRonline
in Various Acts
0
Share on TelegramShare on TwitterShare on WhatsappShare on eMail

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Before : Justice K. Kannan.

UNION BANK OF INDIA — Appellant

versus

VEE JAY ENTERPRISES — Respondent

Regular second appeal No. 2259 of 1986 (O and M)

(i) Power of Attorney – An attestation by a Notary Public is merely a manner of securing an authentication but the power of attorney itself does not require even to be attested – If the plaintiff-Branch Manager was producing the document in original and he was stating that he had the authority to represent the Bank, it ought to have been taken as sufficient proof for upholding the authority for institution of the suit.
(ii) Suit – Institution of – When the validity of institution of the suit hung on a technical objection that there had been no proof that one of the Directors had authority to make a further delegation to a Branch Manager to institute the suit and at the appellate Court, the Bank was filing a notarized copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors made the Court ought to have accepted the document and found that the so-called defect in the institution of the suit was adequately explained and that the institution of the suit by the Branch Manager was fully competent – The banking Companies Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) Section 15.
(iii) Suit — The Banking Companies Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) Section 15 – Suit – Institution of – When the validity of institution of the suit hung on a technical objection that there had been no proof that one of the Directors had authority to make a further delegation to a Branch Manager to institute the suit and at the appellate Court, the Bank was filing a notarized copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors made the Court ought to have accepted the document and found that the so-called defect in the institution of the suit was adequately explained and that the institution of the suit by the Branch Manager was fully competent.
 
judgment

K. Kannan, J.— (23.07.2013) – The following substantial questions of law arise for consideration in this second appeal:-

i) Whether the appellate Court was not in error in finding that execution of documents-P12 to P16 which were in the nature of promissory note, declaration of liability, letter of continuity, hypothecation agreement of machineries and goods constituted a novation of contract, as wrongly assumed, to discharge the liability of the guarantor as being not a party to the documents?

ii) Whether the courts below did not err in finding that the Branch Manager was not duly authorized to institute the suit and prosecute the appeal?

iii) Whether the lower appellate Court failed to apply the discretion to allow for a reception of additional evidence in proof of the authority given by the Board of Directors to one of the Directors to authorize any officer of the Bank to institute the suit?

2. There had been no representation on either side and I have proceeded to examine the case on the basis of the documents filed on behalf of the appellant-Union Bank. The suit for recovery of money against the defendants for the realization of amounts under cash credit limit to the tune of Rs. 10,000/- and a term loan of Rs. 7,500/- granted to the defendants I and 2 and guaranteed by the 3rd defendant was dismissed by the trial Court finding that the suit was barred by limitation. It also found that the Branch Manager had not been duly authorized to institute the suit and the document-a power of attorney, executed by the Director of the Bank was not sufficient proof of such authority, there being no proof that the Director himself was competent to give such a power without the other Directors joining in giving the power of attorney. The appellate Court reversed the finding regarding the limitation against the defendants 1 and 2 and found that the suit against the 3rd defendant was in any event barred by limitation since the fresh document of promissory note and acknowledgment of liability constituted a novation of contract that discharged the guarantor and, therefore, the suit filed beyond the period of 3 years from the date when the original promissory note and the guarantee letter had expired was barred by time against the guarantor. At the appellate Court, the plaintiff-Bank had filed the letter of authority to the Director passed by the Board of Directors empowering him to institute a suit through Branch Manager and allow for an authority to institute the suit. The additional evidence was rejected by the appellate Court, finding that there was no justification offered for not filing the same at the trial Court itself.

3. In this case, I find that the appellate Court had actually held that the liability of the defendants 1 and 2, who were the principal debtors, had been clearly established by die documents. However, the suit against the 3rd defendant came to be dismissed on the issue of limitation by observing that the renewal of liability made through fresh promissory note and the letter of continuity and hypothecation documents constituted novation of contract and, therefore, there was no basis for making the guarantor liable. From the examination of the documents, it is clear that cash credit hypothecation limit and the term loan had been granted to the 2nd defendant-Shri Surinder Maini, Proprietor of M/s. Vee Jay Enterprises, on 25.08.1975. The 2nd defendant had executed a letter of confirmation of the outstanding balance on 30.12.1977 and again on 04.01.1978. He had executed a fresh document on 07.04.1979 which was the letter of renewal (Ex. P 12); Ex. P13 which was the promissory note; Ex. P14 which was the letter of declaration; the letter of continuity was Ex. P15; and Ex. P16 was an agreement regarding hypothecation of machinery and goods. The suit had been filed on 31.01.1981. The Court had found that fresh promissory note was a novation and the other documents also constituted a fresh liability and this document did not avail against the guarantor-the 3rd defendant. The plaintiff relied on a letter of confirmation given by the 3rd defendant on 11.01.1979 (Ex. P17). The Court rejected this document is of no avail to the extend of period of limitation since the 3rd defendant had not acknowledged the original liability and since he was not himself a party to the promissory note and other documents executed as Exs. P12 to P16, the letter of acknowledgment of liability dated 11.01.1979 (Ex. P17) could not extend the period of limitation. The finding of the appellate Court was clearly wrong. The document that bound the 3rd defendant to constitute the liability was Ex. P10 which was a document of continuing guarantee in consideration of the Bank opening the credit limits to defendants 1 and 2 and the 3rd defendant has treated himself as bound for all the demands on the basis of subsisting liability through bills, promissory notes, etc. The suit filed against the 3rd defendant was also therefore in time. The finding of the lower appellate Court that the suit was barred by limitation against the 3rd defendant was erroneous. The suit has been instituted by a Nationalized Bank through the Branch Manager. The plaintiff-Bank had filed the power of attorney executed by the Director of the Bank at the belated stage. The authorization given to one of the Directors of the Board of Directors to institute suits by a supplementary power of attorney (Annexure A 1) and a Board resolution had been brought at the appellate Court and filed as Annexure A2. When the validity of institution of the suit hung on a technical objection that there had been no proof that one of the Directors had authority to make a further delegation to a Branch Manager to institute the suit and at the appellate Court, the Bank was filing a notarized copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors made on 13.03.1985, the Court ought to have accepted the document and found that the so-called defect in the institution of the suit was adequately explained and that the institution of the suit by the Branch Manager was fully competent. The Banking Companies Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings Act, 1970 cures any defect in the constitution of the composition of the Board by Section 15 for action taken on behalf of the Bank by any of the Directors. The appellate court ought to have condoned the delay, admitted the documents and found that the power of attorney already filed and proved as Ex. P 1 showed adequate authority for the Manager of the Bank to institute the suit. The trial Court was in error in finding that the power of attorney had not been attested by Notary Public for its validity. An attestation by a Notary Public is merely a manner of securing an authentication but the power of attorney itself does not require even to be attested. If the plaintiff-Branch Manager was producing the document in original and he was stating that he had the authority to represent the Bank, it ought to have been taken as sufficient proof for upholding the authority for institution of the suit. The dismissal of the suit by the courts below that the Branch Manager did not have the competency to institute the suit was erroneous. All the documents regarding the competence of the Branch Manager to institute the suit and the findings of the appellate Court that the suit against the 3rd defendant had been barred by limitation are set aside. All the issues are held in favour of the plaintiff-Bank and there shall be a decree as prayed, for with costs throughout. The questions of law are answered in favour of the appellant and the second appeal is allowed with costs.

RMS

Download / Print
Tags: 2014 PLRonline 5742, Union Bank of India v. Vee Jay Enterprises
Tags: 2014 PLRonline 5742Union Bank of India v. Vee Jay Enterprises

Related Posts

Various Acts

NIA S. 118 – Unaccounted transactions – All promissory notes appear to have been executed on the same day – If these are unaccounted transactions they are illegal transactions for which no court can pass a decree. [PLRonline 213601]

5.1k
Various Acts

2.1k
Rent – Fair rent – Provisional tent – Refund  – Rent Controller can direct a refund if it finally finds amount found deposited to be in excess.
Various Acts

Section 115 and 114 of the Haryana Cooperative Societies Act, 1984 (22 of 1984) ensure that in a revision, a finding must be given that the order under challenge was either illegal or improper. If no such exercise has been undertaken, the order must be set aside. [PLRonline 444676]

2.1k

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Membership Account
  • LATEST
  • P&H
  • CIVIL
  • CPC
  • CRIMINAL
  • COI
  • SERVICE
  • ARB
  • BANKING
  • CONS
  • HMA
  • IBC
  • MVA
  • NIA
  • Tenancy

© 2023 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Log In
  • Home
  • A
    • A
    • Account
    • Admission
    • Adoption
    • Advocate
    • Agreement
    • Alternate Remedy
    • Annual Confidential Reports (ACR)
    • Arbitration Act, 1940
    • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
  • B
    • B
    • Bail
    • Banking
      • Bank Guarantee
  • C
    • C
    • Charge / Charge Sheet
    • CPC
      • CPC – Sections
      • CPC – Orders and Rules
    • Commercial Courts Act, 2015
    • Companies Act
    • Constitution of India
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Contempt of Courts Act, 1971
    • Contract Act
    • Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970
    • Court
    • Court Fees Act, 1870
    • Criminal Trial
      • Charge / Charge Sheet
    • CrPC (Criminal Procedure Code)
    • Customs Act, 1962
  • D
    • D
    • Disciplinary Proceedings
    • Dying Declaration
  • E
    • E
    • East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949
    • Electricity Act, 2003 (36 of 2003)
    • Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (8 of 1923),
    • Evidence
    • Evidence Act, 1872
  • F
    • F
    • Family Courts Act, 1984
    • FIR ( First Information Report)
  • G
    • G
    • Genealogy
    • General Clauses Act, 1897
  • H
    • H
    • Habeas Corpus
    • Handwriting expert
    • Haryana Acts
      • Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 (24 of 1973)
      • Haryana Municipal Election Rules, 1978
      • Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act 1973
    • Hindu Joint Family
    • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
  • I
    • I
    • IBC – Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
    • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
    • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
    • Information Technology Act
    • Insurance
    • Interpretation
    • Interpretation of Statutes
    • IPC
  • J
    • J
    • Judgment and Orders
    • Judicial Restraint / Judicial Adventurism
  • L
    • L
    • Land Acquisition Act, 1894
    • Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987
    • Limitation Act, 1963
  • M
    • M
    • Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act
    • Marriage
    • Maternity Benefit Act, 1961
    • Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises Development Act (MSME, Act)
    • Mortgage
    • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
    • Mutation
  • N
    • N
    • Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS)
    • National Highway Act, 1956
    • Natural Justice
    • Negotiable Instruments Act (NIA)
  • O
    • O
  • P
    • P
    • Punjab Acts / Rules etc.
      • East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949
      • Punjab Jail Manual
      • Punjab Police Rules, 1934
      • Punjab Regional And Town Planning And Development Act, 1995
      • Punjab State Agriculture Produce Markets Act, 1961
      • Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922
      • Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961
    • Partnership Act, 1932
    • Passports Act, 1967
    • Pay fixation
    • Pedigree
    • Pension
    • Perjury
    • Practice and Procedure
    • Prevention of Corruption Act
    • Principle of estoppel or acquiescence
    • Prisons Act, 1894
    • Proclaimed offender
    • Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988
  • R
    • R
    • RERA
    • Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993
    • Registration Act, 1908
    • Representation of the People Act, , 1951
  • S
    • S
    • Sale of Goods Act
    • Sarfaesi
    • Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
    • Service Matters
    • Service of orders on a government servant
    • Sexual Offence
    • Special Marriage Act, 1954
    • Specific Performance
    • Specific Relief Act, 1963
    • Stamp Act, 1899
    • Stamp duty
    • Stay
    • Suit for declaration / possession
    • Succession Act
    • Suit for recovery of Money
  • T
    • T
    • Tenancy and Rent Act
      • East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949
      • Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act 1973
    • Trade Unions Act
    • Transfer of Property Act, 1882
  • V
    • Voice recording
  • W
    • Wakf Act, 1955
    • Words and Phrases

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Download and Print outs

Subscribers can take a print out of the FULL JUDGMENT by clicking on the “PDF” printer sign on the top right (above the judgment)

 

Punjab Law Reporter

Full text with judgments is available only for Subscribers. Take your TRIAL PACK (free – see below) today.

PLRonline.in Subscription also forms part of the Punjab Law Reporter annual subscription @ Rs. 3400/-

PLRonline subscription @ Rs. 1500/- . Call 9463598502

Click here for activating Trial Pack

 

Save PLRonline.in APP!

Save
×

Please click

Team  PLRonline
Click for support Team PLRonline

Supreme Court Online is also available on Whatsapp, Telegram, Instagram, Email. Join  us here!

× Join