Execution – Limitation – Filed after 12 years.. [PLRonline 114800]by PLRonline 2.1k LogIn required to read judgment: Click here 1987 SupremeCourtOnline 0003 (PLRonline 114800) SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ( Before : Sabyasachi ...
Limitation Act, S. 5 – Appeal by government – Delay of more than 4 years by PLRonline 2.1k State of Bihar through District Magistrate v. Suchit Halwai, 2017 PLRonline 0207 Supreme Court of India J. Chelameswar J. , ...
Limitation ActS. 5 – Sufficient cause – Substantial justice – Every day’s delay must be explainedby PLRonline 2.1k 1. Ordinarily a litigant does not stand to benefit by lodging an appeal late. 2. Refusing to condone delay can ...
Doctrine of merger – Does not make a distinction between an order of reversal, modification or an order of confirmation passed by the appellate authority. [SCeJ 212701]by PLRonline 2.1k LogIn required for accessing Judgment There can only be one operative decree governing the same subject-matter at a given point ...
Limitation Act, Art. 58 and 72 – Suit for declaration, mandatory inunction and seeking direction to appellants to initiate and complete acquisition proceedings in respect of plaintiff’s land. (PLRonline 427601)by PLRonline 2.1k LogIn to read FULL TEXT/ Download STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH v. CHANDERVIR SINGH NEGI, 2023 SCeJ 0116, 2023 PLRonline 427601 ...
CrPC S. 319 – Application by prosecution to summon additional accused – Petitioners had also been nominated as the accused in the said FIR though, they were found innocent – This finding is not at all to be construed to be conclusive qua their innocence – Right to fair investigation and trial is not meant to be confined to the accused person only and rather, it equally extends to the victim also.by PLRonline 2.1k 2021 PLRonline 5202 Punjab and Haryana High Court Meenakshi Mehta J. PUNEET v. STATE OF HARYANA CRR No.2856 of 2018 ...
Limitation Act S. 5 – Sufficient causeby PLRonline 2.1k Limitation Act S. 5 – Sufficient cause - Held, What needs to be emphasised is that even though a liberal ...
A distinction must be made between a case where the delay is inordinate and a case where the delay is of few days and whereas in the former case the consideration of prejudice to the other sideby PLRonline 2.1k Limitation Act S. 5, Sufficient Cause - Limitation A distinction must be made between a case where the delay is ...
‘Sufficient cause’ has to receive liberal construction, it must squarely fall within the concept of reasonable time and proper conduct of the party concerned.by PLRonline 2.1k Limitation Act S. 5, Sufficient Cause - Limitation '25. We may state that even if the term 'sufficient cause' has ...
Sufficient Cause – Limitation – No straitjacket formula is prescribedby PLRonline 2.1k Limitation Act S. 5, Sufficient Cause - Limitation While considering an application for condonation of delay no straitjacket formula is ...
Limitation – Justifiably advocated adoption of liberal approach in condoning the delay of short duration and a stricter approach where the delay is inordinateby PLRonline 2.1k Limitation Act S. 5, Sufficient Cause - Limitation The courts are bestowed with the power to condone the delay, if ...
Limitation – Adoption of strict standard of proof sometimes fails to protect public justice and it may result in public mischiefby PLRonline 2.1k Limitation Act S. 5, Sufficient Cause - Limitation Adoption of strict standard of proof sometimes fails to protect public justice ...
Limitation – Fraud – If such an interpolated order is allowed to stand, there would be failure of justiceby PLRonline 2.1k Limitation Act S. 5, Fraud Court was dealing with a fact- situation where the interim order passed by the court ...
Limitation – Expression ‘sufficient cause’ in Section 5 must receive a liberal construction so as to advance substantial justice and generally delays in preferring appeals are required to be condoned in the interest of justiceby PLRonline 2.1k Limitation Act S. 5, Sufficient Cause - Limitation 'The contours of the area of discretion of the courts in the ...