Judgments not inter partes are inadmissible in evidence
Judgments not inter partes are inadmissible in evidence barring exceptional cases - Under the Evidence Act a judgment which is ...
Tag: Evidence Act S. 40
Evidence – Judgment – Admissibility of
Evidence Act, S. 40, S. 41 S. 42, S. 43, S. 13 - Judgments of courts are admissible in evidence ...
Evidence – Judgment – Admissibility of
Evidence Act, S. 32, Evidence Act, S. 32(5), Judgment – Admissibility of - (1) A judgment in rem e.g judgments ...
No judgment which was not inter partes or the one to which neither the plaintiff nor the defendant were parties could be used in evidence for any purpose
Full Bench of the Madras High Court in Tripurana Seethapathi Rao Dora v. Rokkam Venkanna Dora AIR 1922 Mad 71 where Kumaraswami Sastri, ...
Judgment not inter partes – No judgment which was not inter partes or the one to which neither the plaintiff nor the defendant were parties could be used in evidence for any purpose
This principle was reiterated in the case of Coca-Cola Company of Canada Ltd. v. Pepsi-Cola Company of Canada Ltd. AIR 1942 ...
Judgment not inter partes – Truth of the matter decided a judgment is not admissible evidence against one who is a stranger to the suit
Maharaja Sir Kesho Prasad Singh Bahadur v. Bahuria Mt. Bhagjogna Kuer AIR 1937 PC 69 the Privy Council made the following observations ...
Judgment not inter partes – findings in judgments not inter partes are not admissible in evidence.
Gadadhar Chowdhury v. Sarat Chandra Chakravarty AIR 1941 Cal 193 it was held that findings in judgments not inter partes are ...
Judgment not inter partes
Gujja Lall v. Fatteh Lall ILR 1881 6 Cal 171 a Full Bench exhaustively considered the ambit and scope of Sections 40 to ...
