“Vendors Cannot Escape Contract After Accepting Additional Payment Post-Deadline”
2025 PLRonline 408867 = (2025-2)217 PLR 797 (SC) (SN) Download: 2025 PLRonline 408867 = (2025-2)217 PLR 797 (SC) (SN) . ...
Tag: CPC S. 100
[SC] CPC S. 100 – High Court cannot substitute its own opinion for that of the first appellate Court, unless it finds that the conclusions drawn by the lower Court were erroneous being contrary to the mandatory provisions of the applicable law or contrary to the law as pronounced by the Supreme Court or based on inadmissible evidence or no evidence. [PLRonline]
CPC S. 100 - High Court cannot substitute its own opinion for that of the first appellate Court, unless it ...
[SC] CPC O. 8 R 6A – Counter claim – Must be instituted before the defendant has delivered his defence or before the time limit for delivering his defence has expired. [2022 PLRonline 0600]
Punjab Courts Act, 1918, Section 41 - Though the requirement of formulation of a substantial question of law was not ...
CPC S. 10 – Is referable to a suit instituted in the civil Court and it cannot apply to proceedings of other nature instituted under any other statute – Not open to the High Court to bye-pass Section 10 CPC by invoking Section 151 CPC.
CPC S. 10 - Section 10 suggests that it is referable to a suit instituted in the civil Court and ...
CPC S. 100 – Concurrent findings of facts recorded by both the Courts below – Unless the concurrent findings recorded by the courts below were found to be perverse, the same were not required to be interfered with by the High Court in exercise of powers under Section 100 of CPC.
CPC S. 100 - Concurrent findings of facts recorded by both the Courts below - Unless the concurrent findings recorded ...
[P&H] CPC S. 100 – Once a decree sheet has been prepared, the defendant-petitioners cannot merely challenge the order dismissing their application for condonation of delay by filing a revision petition when they have a remedy of filing a second appeal against the decree sheet drawn up
CPC S. 100 - Once a decree sheet has been prepared, the defendant-petitioners cannot merely challenge the order dismissing their ...
Punjab Courts Act, Section 41 – Civil Procedure Code, 1976, S. 100 – Insofar as the State of Punjab is concerned, a second appeal does not require formulation of a substantial question of law
Punjab Courts Act, Section 41 - Civil Procedure Code, 1976 S. 100 - Insofar as the State of Punjab is ...
CPC S. 100 – Principles relating to Section 100
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – S. 100 - The principles relating to Section 100, relevant for this case, may be summarized ...
CPC S. 100 – phrase “substantial question of law”
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – S. 100 - The phrase "substantial question of law", as occurring in the amended Section ...
CPC S. 100 – To be “substantial”, a question of law must be debatable, not previously settled by the law of the land or any binding precedent,
CPC S. 100 - To be “substantial”, a question of law must be debatable, not previously settled by the law ...
CPC S. 100 – Second appeal – A second appeal, or for that matter, any appeal is not a matter of right
CPC S. 100 - Second appeal - A second appeal, or for that matter, any appeal is not a matter ...
CPC S. 100 – Substantial question of law – Not defined.
The phrase ”substantial question of law”, as occurring in the amended Section 100 CPC is not defined in the Code. ...
CPC S. 100 – “Question of Law” – Test
”The proper test for determining whether a question of law raised in the case is substantial would, in our opinion, ...
CPC S. 100, 103- There is no prohibition on entertaining a second appeal even on a question of fact
There is no prohibition on entertaining a second appeal even on a question of fact Civil Procedure Code , 1908 ...
CPC S. 100, 103 – Second appeal lies only on a substantial question of law
Second appeal lies only on a substantial question of law Civil Procedure Code , 1908 (V of 1908), Section 100, ...