CPC S. 100 – Once a decree sheet has been prepared, the defendant-petitioners cannot merely challenge the order dismissing their application for condonation of delay by filing a revision petition when they have a remedy of filing a second appeal against the decree sheet drawn up – Revision petition is not maintainable as the lower Appellate Court has confirmed the decision of the Trial Court on merits and this amounts to the first appeal being heard and finally decided on merits – A decree sheet has been drawn up by the lower Appellate Court – The defendant-petitioners have chosen not to challenge the decree passed by the lower Appellate Court though this remedy was available to them under Section 100 CPC.
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
[P&H] CPC S. 100 – Once a decree sheet has been prepared, the defendant-petitioners cannot merely challenge the order dismissing their application for condonation of delay by filing a revision petition when they have a remedy of filing a second appeal against the decree sheet drawn up
0
327
SHARES2.5k
VIEWSLeave a Reply Cancel reply
LATEST
- “Vendors Cannot Escape Contract After Accepting Additional Payment Post-Deadline” November 1, 2025
- MOU for Joint Development Agreement Not Enforceable Under Specific Relief Act – Karnataka High Court October 29, 2025
- Termination of Arbitral Proceedings for Non-Filing of Statement of Claims — Not an Arbitral Award under Section 25(a) October 27, 2025
- (no title) October 22, 2025
- Supreme Court: Deception Alone Insufficient for Cheating Without Dishonest Inducement Prosecution Must Prove Accused Made Forged Document and Had Requisite Mens Rea. ID 416860 October 22, 2025
- Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Sections 30, 31(2) & Punjab Tenancy Act, Section 5(2) – Occupancy tenants entitled to compensation – Payment wrongly made to landowners despite protest and without notice to tenants – Apportionment petition/reference by occupancy tenants maintainable – Jamabandi entries prove occupancy rights if unrebutted. October 22, 2025
- Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Compensation dispute among claimants – Civil Court jurisdiction not barred – Award by Collector not final among interested persons – Claimant can file separate civil suit for resolution of dispute October 22, 2025
