Specific Performance Denied but Lump Sum Compensation Awarded
The Supreme Court upheld denial of specific performance after 17 years but modified the High Court order directing forfeiture of ...
Tag: Agreement to sell
“Vendors Cannot Escape Contract After Accepting Additional Payment Post-Deadline”
2025 PLRonline 408867 = (2025-2)217 PLR 797 (SC) (SN) Download: 2025 PLRonline 408867 = (2025-2)217 PLR 797 (SC) (SN) . ...
Limitation Act, 1963 S. 17 – Suit for recovery of earnest money – Limitation for recovering earnest money starts from contract non-performance or fraud discovery, not payment. Plaintiff proved fraud as the defendant had already sold the shops in question. PLRonline #2419302
limitation would start from the date of refusal of the execution of the agreement; as defined under the agreement; or ...
Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell – Parties having close but strained relationship – No evidence to show source of funds , or receipts in writing – It is unbelievable that a person would pay a huge amount and yet not insist on the execution of the sale deed – Suit rightly dismissed [PLR online 414686]
.... In a situation where the relationship was so strained, it does not stand to reason as to why even ...
Court Fee Act S. 16 – CPC S. 89 – Specific Relief Act S. 38 – Emphasize the legislature’s effort to settle cases through alternative dispute resolution mechanisms – Settlement – Refund of court fees even if not asked for. [PLRonline 318802 (P&H)]
2015 PLRonline 0207 (P&H) PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT Before:- Justice Bharat Bhushan Parsoon. Pradeep Sonawat - Petitioner Versus Satish ...
Agreement to sell – Executed on stamp paper purchased in the name of the plaintiff’s wife, is of no consequence – Can only deem the document to be not properly stamped but cannot hold it to be invalid – Can be admitted in evidence by paying stamp duty and penalty. [ID 210300]
The agreement to sell was executed on stamp paper purchased in the name of the plaintiff's wife, but this is ...
Specific Relief Act S. 13 – This right of the plaintiff is secured by Section 13 of the Act which entitles the plaintiff to ask the vendor to clear his title; if he does not have the requisite title; to pass on to the vendee. [PLRonline 311090]
LogIn to download judgment and Full headnote / PLRonline 311090 Lokesh v. Rameshwar Tyagi , 2017 PLRonline 9000 Punjab and ...
Postal receipt not containing the address of the addressee – Not a valid service – Specific Relief Act, S. 14 , 27, 31 – Unilateral cancellation of an agreement to sell by one party is not allowed, except in certain cases. [PLRonline 417002]
LogIn to download judgment and Full headnote / PLRonline 417002 Brahm Dutt v. Sarabjit Singh, 2017 PLRonline 0206 The production ...
Agreement to Sell – Signed only by the vendor and not purchaser – Valid. [SupremeCourtOnline 211102]
LogIn to read full judgment Aloka Bose v. Parmatma Devi , 2008 PLRonline 0200 An unilateral contract is ...
Suit for specific performance – Conduct of the appellants shows their real intentions, as immediately after the stipulated date i.e 30.4.2009, they issued notice on 1.5.2009 , terminating the agreement to sell in question without giving an opportunity to him to perform his part of the contract by extending time . [2014 PLRonline 0207]
The suit for specific performance involves the termination of an agreement to sell without giving the other party an opportunity ...
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 – S.24(2) – Possession of the land in question could not be taken by the authority due to pending litigation/stay – Affect of. [2023 PLRonline 9002 SC]
Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Manjeet Kaur , 2023 PLRonline 9002 Supreme Court of India JUSTICE M.R. SHAH, JUSTICE ...
Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja, 2021 PLRonline 9094 (SC)
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and M.R. Shah, JJ.) SATISH CHANDER AHUJA - Appellant v. SNEHA ...
Stamp Act S. 35(a) – Distinction between the stamp duty payable at the time of execution of the agreement to sell evidencing delivery of possession in the context of the amendment brought in Entry no.5 in Schedule 1-A as applicable to the State of Punjab
Distinction between the stamp duty payable at the time of execution of the agreement to sell evidencing delivery of possession ...
TPA S. 53A – Execution of the registered agreement to sell coupled with delivery of possession does not result in transfer of the immovable property worth more than Rs.100/- if not registered
Registration of the agreement to sell coupled with delivery of possession has been made mandatory if the document is to ...