Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 28 – Lambardar – Appointment of – Age – Is a relevant factor . [PLRonline 119102]
2008 SupremeCourtOnline 0201 ; PLRonline 119102 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ( Before : S. B. Sinha, J; Cyriac Joseph, J ...
Tag: 1995
Criminal Trial – Circumstantial evidence – Chain of evidence must be so complete as to not leave any reasonable grounds for a conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused; the accused ‘must be’ and not merely ‘may be’ guilty, before the Court can convict. [2023 SCeJ 0226 = 2023 PLRonline 437602 (SC)]
Dakkata Balaram Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh., 2023 SCeJ 0226 = 2023 PLRonline 437602 (SC) Supreme Court of India ...
Land Acquisition Act of 1894 – Claimant is entitled to payment of interest on solatium from the date of entitlement as provided under the provisions of the Act and payment of interest cannot be restricted from the date of Sunder case decided. Obiter in Gurpreet Singh’s case, which incidentally made some observation with regard to the payment of interest on solatium, is not the binding precedent. [2015 PLRonline 0205 (SC)]
2015 PLRonline 0205 (SC), Periyar And Pareekanni Rubbers Ltd. v. State Of Kerala SUPREME COURT OF INDIA V. Gopala Gowda ...
Banking – Auction – Mortgage – Receiver has responsibility to maintain the property in good condition and prevent its deterioration – Creditor cannot later claim that the property lost value while in their custody, will be accountable for any loss in property value.
While the attempt of the banks and financial institutions to minimize their losses makes good business sense, there cannot be ...
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 – S.118, S.121 – Merely because instrument of partition was not drawn u/s 121 , could not be said that the partition was not completed. [ 2023 SCeJ 0211]
LogIn to read 2023 SCeJ 0211 Supreme Court of India Ajay Rastogi J. Bela M. Trivedi J. JHABBAR SINGH (DECEASED) ...
Indian Succession Act S. 63(c) – Wills, co-ownership of land, and the ability to seek possession or partition of agricultural land. [2020 PLRonline 5205]
Sucha Ram (since deceased) through Lrs v. Lachhman Dass, 2020 PLRonline 5205 The testimony of attesting witnesses is silent with ...
Jamia Masjid v. K V Rudrappa (Since Dead) By Lrs.
2021 PLRonline 9095 (SC), (2021)11 SCR 672 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud J ; Vikram Nath J ...
Co-operative Society – Expulsion of member on account of non payment of dues – Upheld – Delhi Cooperative Society Rules, 1973, Rule 36(2). [2023 SCeJ 0158, (2023-1)209 PLR 719 (SC)]
2023 SCeJ 0158 = (2023-1)209 PLR 719 (SC) Geeta and Others v. Financial Commissioner Govt. of NCT Delhi SUPREME COURT ...
Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja, 2021 PLRonline 9094 (SC)
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and M.R. Shah, JJ.) SATISH CHANDER AHUJA - Appellant v. SNEHA ...
“Importance of Corroboration in Criminal Trials: Extra-Judicial Confession as a Weak Piece of Evidence”
Admissibility of extra-judicial confessions in criminal trials in India. Read on to understand the circumstances in which it can be ...
Criminal Trial – Extra-judicial confession is a weak piece of evidence – Where an extra-judicial confession is surrounded by suspicious circumstances, its credibility becomes doubtful and it loses its importance. 2012 PLRonline 0008
2012 PLRonline 0108 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA A.K. Patnaik , Swatanter Kumar, JJ. Sahadevan v. State Of Tamil Nadu Criminal ...
Madras Bar Association v. Union Of India, 2021 PLRonline 9093
Supreme Court Of India L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta, S. Ravindra Bhat, JJ. Madras Bar Association v. Union Of India ...
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 – Whether workman could raise the issue of unfair labour practice before termination of his service. (SC)
1995 PLRonline 0005 Supreme Court Of India G.N Ray S.B Majmudar, JJ. Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. Ashok Vishnu Kate And ...
Service matter – There is a bar as such if the proceedings are not instituted while the employee was in service, for events which took place more than four years before such initiation
2022 PLRonline 0497 Punjab and Haryana High Court Before G.S. Sandhawalia and Vikas Suri, JJ. BALKRISHAN SOBTI v. PUNJAB AND ...
Tenancy – Bona fide need – Leave to defend – Not granted – Delhi Rent Control Act, S. 14(1)(e). PLRonline 313402 (Del.)
Tenancy - Bona fide need - Leave to defend - Delhi Rent Control Act, S. 14(1)(e).
