State Of Madhya Pradesh v. Pradeep Sharma, 2013 PLRonline 0007

Download / Print SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before: P Sathasivam, Ranjan Gogoi, JJ. State Of Madhya Pradesh Versus Pradeep Sharma CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2049 OF 2013 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 4102 of 2013) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2050 OF 2013 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 4406 of 2013) 06.12.2013 crpc s. 438 ...

P & H High Court judgment : requires you to be logged in with PLRonline.in / Punjab Law Reporter subscription.SUPREME COURT judgment : requires you to be logged in with SUPREMECOURTonline.in / Supreme Court e@Journal subscription.This content is for Trial Membership (Full access for 10 days), Punjab Law Reporter (subscribers-only), and Supreme Court e@Journal - (subscribers only - 1 calendar year) members only.
Login Join NowFull text Judgments is for members only.
JOIN TRIAL MEMBERSHIP or email at plr@plronline.in or call 9463598502Trial membership : Full site 21 daysPunjab Law Reporter subscribers (@Rs 3400/- for 2022) : 1 year subscription to PLR ( monthly parts) + SCe@Journal Subscription 2023 + Full site subscription for www.SupremeCourtonline.in (BEST OFFER !!! you save 1900/-))Supreme Court E@Journal (@Rs 1500/- for 2023) : 1 year subscription to SCe@Journal Subscription 2023 + subscription for www.SupremeCourtonline.in ( except Punjab Law Reporter reported cases)

Tags: 2013 PLRonline 0007 State Of Madhya Pradesh v. Pradeep Sharma

State Of Madhya Pradesh v. Pradeep Sharma, 2013 PLRonline 0007

Punjab Land Revenue Act S. 16 – Financial Commissioner, Haryana, would have the jurisdiction to entertain the revision petition as the proceedings have been initiated in the year 2006.

Local Commissioner – Order refusing to appoint – Not a revisable order. [PLRonline 402605]

Punjab Land Revenue Act, Section 16(1) – Sanad takseem – Order of the Collector being merged in the order of the Commissioner can be assailed only with the Financial Commissioner. [PLRonline 316002]

Order 16 Rule 1 of the CPC is not mandatory but is directory in nature.n [PLRonline 247082]

Cruelty – Mere filing of a criminal case itself cannot be termed as “cruelty” | Desertion – Having regard to the nature of the allegations made in the complaint cannot be said that the wife had no valid reason to leave the company of the husband. [PLRonline 401605]

Children custody – Best Interest of Child – Scope of – Habeas Corpus – Children natural citizens of USA , are in the grips of their mother – Continuance of present status, will damage their progress in academics, and their emotional quotient. [(2023-1)209 PLRIJ 059]

“Understanding Burden of Proof for Input Tax Credit Claims under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003”

Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja, 2021 PLRonline 9094 (SC)

Hindu Marriage Act, S. 28-A – Enforcement/Execution of orders of maintenance

Hindu Marriage Act, S. 24 – Permanent alimony – Quantum of maintenance – CrPC S. 125

Hindu Marriage Act, S. 24 – Maintenance – Where several marriages last for a short time – Inequitable to direct the contesting spouse to pay permanent alimony to the applicant for the rest of her life – Duration of marriage would be a relevant factor – Permanent alimony

CrPC , S. 482 - Inherent power of a High Court to stay a trial under the Act -

CrPC S. 438 - Is to be exercised only in exceptional cases where it appears that the person may be falsely implicated or where there are reasonable grounds for holding that a person accused of an offence is not likely to otherwise misuse his liberty.

State Of Madhya Pradesh v. Pradeep Sharma, 2013 PLRonline 0007

Related Posts

RAJNESH V. NEHA, (2020-4)200 PLR 793 (SC), 2020 SCeJ 2087, 2020 PLRonline 4498300

RAVINDER KAUR GREWAL V. MANJIT KAUR, 2019 SCeJ 892, (2019-3)195 PLR 584 (SC)(SN) , 2019 PLRonline 203208

Mathew Varghese v. M. Amritha Kumar

Welcome Back!

Create New Account!

Retrieve your password

Save PLRonline.in APP!