Pensionary benefits – Ad- hoc employee – State continued to take his services as an ad-hoc for over three decades – State can not now contend that as the services rendered by the respondent are ad-hoc, he is not entitled to pension/pensionary benefit.
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
[SC] Ad- hoc employee is entitled to pensionary benefits
457
SHARES3.5k
VIEWSLATEST
- CrPC S. 482 – High Court Cannot Conduct Mini Trial While Considering Quashing Petition Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court January 17, 2026
- Amendment Seeking Refund of Earnest Money as Alternative Relief Allowable at Any Stage; Limitation Not a Bar: P&H High Court January 17, 2026
- High Court’s Limits under CrPC S. 439: No Blanket Orders in POCSO Bail Matters – Sets aside HC direction mandating age verification tests in all POCSO cases during bail hearings. January 12, 2026
- District Magistrate’s Powers Under SARFAESI Act Section 14 Are Ministerial and Not Adjudicatory January 11, 2026
- Bail for S. 319 CrPC Accused January 10, 2026
- Ratification of Power of Attorney Acts – Effect on Limitation – Specific Relief Act January 9, 2026
- Stamp Act, S. 35, 47-A – A document once registered, the Registering Authority, ceases to have any control over the document and it becomes a functuous officio the moment he loses the control over the document January 8, 2026
I’m very much egar to study your publication related to judgements. I’m retired District Judge and now retired