Petitioner Counsel: DEVASA & CO. , Respondent Counsel: SHASHANK MANISH
LogIn with SUPREME COURT e@JOURNAL subscription for full text / Download
Motor Vehicles Act 1988 S. 166 – Injured – Aged 5 years - Not able to move both his legs and had complete sensory loss in the legs, urinary incontinence, bowel constipation and bed sore – Has lost his childhood and is dependent on others for his routine work – Minimum wages payable to a skilled workman in 2010-11 is to the tune of Rs. 3708.70 - 40% for future prospects - Entitled to one attendant for the rest of his life though he may be able to walk with the help of assistant device - The device also requires to be replaced every 5 years -Reasonable to award cost of 2 devices i.e., Rs.10 lakhs - Loss of marriage prospects - Tribunal has rejected the claim of taxi expenses for the reason that the taxi driver has not been produced - It is impossible to produce the numerous taxi drivers. Still further, the Tribunal should have realized the condition of the child who had complete sensory loss in the legs - Therefore, if the parents of the child have taken him in a taxi, probably that was the only option available to them – Awarded Rs.2 lakhs as conveyance charges - Rs. 49,93,000/- awarded. 2022 SCeJ 0406 , 2022 PLRonline 1794