Constitution of India, 1950, Article 227 – Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, Section 127 – Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966 , Rule 19, 43 – Purpose of changing the revenue entries — The revenue authorities do not have power or jurisdiction to pronounce upon legal rights or legal entitlement or even to pronounce upon the validity of a Will or a sale deed and such power is undoubtedly vested with the Civil Court – The Tahsildar had no competence to say one way or the other on the validity of the sale deed and to the extent the Tahsildar ventured upon to opine that the sale transaction was one not tenable or proper is an adventure not permitted in law — Whatever may be said by the revenue authorities their domain is only for effecting a change in the revenue records and to show the names of particular persons, which can notion pass on or by itself create rights to such persons who have already acquired them and it is not as though the revenue entries by themselves give such right – Revenue entries are not conclusive of the rights of the parties to the properties.
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
Revenue authorities do not have power or jurisdiction to pronounce upon legal rights or legal entitlement or even to pronounce upon the validity of a Will or a sale deed and such power is undoubtedly vested with the Civil Court
0
324
SHARES2.5k
VIEWSLATEST
- “Vendors Cannot Escape Contract After Accepting Additional Payment Post-Deadline” November 1, 2025
- MOU for Joint Development Agreement Not Enforceable Under Specific Relief Act – Karnataka High Court October 29, 2025
- Termination of Arbitral Proceedings for Non-Filing of Statement of Claims — Not an Arbitral Award under Section 25(a) October 27, 2025
- (no title) October 22, 2025
- Supreme Court: Deception Alone Insufficient for Cheating Without Dishonest Inducement Prosecution Must Prove Accused Made Forged Document and Had Requisite Mens Rea. ID 416860 October 22, 2025
- Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Sections 30, 31(2) & Punjab Tenancy Act, Section 5(2) – Occupancy tenants entitled to compensation – Payment wrongly made to landowners despite protest and without notice to tenants – Apportionment petition/reference by occupancy tenants maintainable – Jamabandi entries prove occupancy rights if unrebutted. October 22, 2025
- Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Compensation dispute among claimants – Civil Court jurisdiction not barred – Award by Collector not final among interested persons – Claimant can file separate civil suit for resolution of dispute October 22, 2025
