Latest

CPA – Subsequent purchaser – Builder – Non delivery of flat – Is a consumer

If any Central Statute creates priority of a charge in favour of a secured creditor, the same will rank above the charge in favour of a State for a tax due under the Value Added Tax of the State .

SC/ST Act – For offence to be constituted, there must be an allegation that the accused not being a member of Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe committed an offence under the IPC punishable for a term of 10 years or more against a member of the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe knowing that such person belongs to such `community’. [PLRonline #497684]

IPC S. 34 – Common Intention – Can be formed even in the course of the incident – Would come into play where participation of the accused in a crime is proved and the common intention is also established. [PLRonline 482604]

Consumer Protection Act – Stocks and shares – Invesment in – Complainant is not a Consumer – It is not the case of the Complainant that he had invested the money in share market exclusively for earning his livelihood. [2022 PLRonline 0596 (NCDRC)]

NIA S. 138 – Liability of Joint Account Holders – There is no provision for taking cognizance against a person other than the “drawer” of the cheque. [(2023-4)212 PLR 177]

Court proceedings – Videography – Whether would amount to criminal contempt of court ? [(2023-4)212 PLR 163]

MVA – Criminal case – Acquittal in a criminal case – Effect on claim petition

Court proceedings – Videography – Court proceedings in the High Court or any other Court subordinate thereto cannot be videotaped, photographed or telecast without taking prior written permission from the High Court. [PLRonline]

NDPS S. 2 (viia) read with the notification S.O. No. 1055 (E) dated 19/10/2001 , Section 37, 52A – “commercial quantity” – Weight Adjustment due to Drying – Weight recorded during inventory before the Magistrate considered – Bail Consideration for Multiple Accused. [PLRonline 413680]

[SC] CPC O. 7 R. 11 – Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Order 7 Rule 11 – Assessment of Plaints – Court should not engage in assessing the correctness or merits of the plaint’s averments – Court made an error by partially rejecting the plaint . [PLRonline 416680]

[SC] Insurance – Surveyor’s report – Not relied – Reliance by surveyor on forensic report – Claim payable.

[SC] Insurance – Surveyor’s report, though important, is not absolute and not binding on the parties – It is not that sacrosanct that it cannot be departed from; it is not conclusive. [ PLRonline 368351]

IT Act S. 67(A) – Posted on Instagram 4-5 pictures of petitioner kissing the complainant on her cheek – Bail granted. [2022 PLRonline 0595]

Insurance – Mediclaim policy – Pre existing disease – Non-disclosure – Burden of proof – Prescription – Mere mentioning in the prescription would not amount to establishing a concealment – Senior Citizens policy – Pre-medical check-up – Having opted to waive of was thus conscious – Insurer liable. [PLRonline # 446681]

Login
Register

PLRonline.in

If any Central statute creates priority of a charge in favour of a secured creditor, the same will rank above the charge in favour of a State for a tax due under the value added tax of the State (Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act), Section 37)

Amendment made by Parliament is to give priority to the secured creditors vis a vis State dues without speaking about the first charge (Rajasthan VAT Act, Section 47)

Home Banking

If any Central Statute creates priority of a charge in favour of a secured creditor, the same will rank above the charge in favour of a State for a tax due under the Value Added Tax of the State .

by PLRonline

in Banking, Sarfaesi

Share on Telegram Share on Twitter Share on Whatsapp Share on eMail

Related Posts

Banking

Sarfaesi S. 14 – Complaint u/s 340 CrPC against authorised officer before DM – Complaint before District Magistrate under Section 340 Cr.P.C. against the authorised officer for concealing material facts – Maintaianble. [(2023-4) PLR 001 ]

Banking

CPC O. 7 R. 11 – Power is limited to rejection of the plaint as a whole or not at all – It is impermissible to reject the plaint only against one of the defendants – Sarfaesi. [PLRonline #348208]

Banking

IBC S. 9 – Settlement entered into between parties- Does not fall within the ambit of an operational debt. [2023 PLRonline 9004 (NCLT)]

Comments 2

scenesource says:

2 years ago

It’s hard to come by educated people in this particular subject,
however, you seem like you know what you’re talking about!
Thanks

Reply
- Sandeep Suri says:
  
  2 years ago
  
  The law on this subject is still developing….early days
  Team PLR
  
  Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

© 2023 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

Login
Sign Up

×

Click for support Team PLRonline