MVA S. 149 – Distinction has to be made between “route permit” and “permit”
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (59 of1988), S. 149(2), S. 2(28) and S. 2(31)- A distinction has to be made between ...
MVA S. 149(2) – Use of a vehicle in a public place without a permit is a fundamental statutory infraction – Insurer not liable.
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (59 of1988), S. 149(2), Section 66 - Use of a vehicle in a public place without ...
Amrit Paul Singh v. TATA AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd, 2018 PLRonline 1302
PLR PLRonline 2018 PLRonline 1302 (SC) (Appeal from (2017-2)186 PLR 805) . SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (Dipak Misra, C.J. and ...
COI Art. 136 – Appeal by special leave – Against interlocutory orders
Constitution of India, Art. 136 - Appeal by special leave – Against interlocutory orders - As a general rule as ...
CPC O. 6 R. 17 – Mere failure to set out even an essential fact does not, by itself constitute a new cause of action.
CPC, 1908, O. 6 R. 17, O. 30 R. 1 - Amendment of plaint – Suit for recovery of money ...
CPC O. 6 R. 2 – Procedural law – Provisions relating to pleadings – Object of
CPC, 1908, O. 6 R. 2 - Procedural law - Provisions relating to pleadings - Object of - Procedural law ...
Ganesh Trading Co v. Moji Ram, 1978 PLRonline 0101
PLR PLRonline . 1978 PLRonline 0101 SUPREME COURT (M. H. BEG,C.J.I. and D. A. DESAI,J.) M/s. Ganesh Trading Co v. ...
Partenership firm – Dissolution – Effect of dissolution is not to render the firm non-existent – It continues to exist for all purposes necessary for its winding up – One of these is of course the recovery of moneys due to it by suit or otherwise – CPC O. 30 R. 1
Vivian Bose, J., Said (at p. 315): "It is argued on behalf of the defendants that O. 30, R. 1, ...
CPC O. 30 – Existence of the provisions of O. XXX in the Code does not mean that a plaint filed in the name of a firm doing business outside India is not a suit infact by the partners of that firm individually
A case of a partnership firm where this Court pointed out that Sec. 4 of the Partnership Act uses the ...
Specific Relief Act S. 22 (2) – CPC O. 6, R. 17 – Amendment of
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 22 (2) - Civil Procedure Code 1908 (V of 1908) Order 6, Rule 17 – ...
Jasbir Singh v. Amrik Singh, 2022 PLRonline 0495
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT Before: Mr. Justice Manoj Bajaj. JASBIR SINGH – Petitioner, Versus AMRIK SINGH – Respondent. CR-3306-2022 ...
Rajaram v. State Of Madhya Pradesh, 2022 SCeJ 1352
2022 SCeJ 1352 Supreme Court of India Present: Justice Ravindra Bhat, Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia RAJARAM – Appellant, Versus STATE OF ...
Multiple dying declarations that may contain inconsistent facts
Court considered and indicated the approach which may be adopted, where the evidence includes multiple dying declarations, that may contain ...
Multiple dying declarations
“30. A survey of the decisions would show that the principles can be culled out as follows:a. Conviction of a ...
Education – Backdoor Admission – Cancellation – Prayer of students to allow them to complete their course is not required to be accepted
Constitution of India, Art. 226 – Admission – Cancellation – PG Dental course - Students got admission through the backdoor ...