Adjournment – Non presence of counsel.
Para 1: Mr. R.K. Ojha, learned counsel appears on behalf of the counsel for the appellants and submits that the ...
Adjournment – Convenience of counsel must subserve the larger interest of the administration of justice.
a litigant is not entitled to choose the personnel of the Court to hear his case, nor can he insist upon ...
Adjournment – Senior counsel not appearing
It is not made clear that as to under which provision of law, name of Senior Advocate is reflected in ...
NIA S. 138 – While imposing sentence, Court can impose sentence lesser than two years – But there is no discretion to reduce the imposition of fine
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – Section 138 - Section provides that if any person commits an offence under Section 138 ...
Pronouncement of judgment is also a stage in the case
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908) - Pronouncement of judgment is also a stage in the case just as ...
BDR DEVELOPERS PVT LTD v. NARSINGH SHAH – 2021 SCeJ 1077
2021 SCeJ 1077 (Del.) 2021-PLR-SCEJ-1077Download HIGH COURT OF DELHI Before: Justice Asha Menon M/S BDR DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. – Petitioner, ...
Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board v. Subhash Chand – 2006 SCeJ 004
2006 SCeJ 004Download 2006 SCeJ 004 Supreme Court of India Before : Justice S.B. Sinha, Justice P.K. Balasubramanyan The ...
IDA S. 25 – If legal right has been derived by the respondent herein to continue in service in terms of the provisions of the Act under which he is governed, then only, would the question of depriving him of any status or privilege arise
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(oo), 25 - In Municipal Council, Samrala v. Raj Kumar, (2006) 3 SCC 81, wherein, ...
240 days – only because a person had been working for more than 240 days, he does not derive any legal right to be regularised in service
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(oo), 25 - 240 days - It is now well settled that only because a ...
Gangadhar Pillai v. Siemens Ltd – 2006 SCeJ 003
2006 SCeJ 003Download 2006 SCeJ 003 Supreme Court of India Before : Justice S.B. Sinha, Justice Dalveer Bhandari Gangadhar ...
240 days – Completed- rights
IDA S. 2(oo), IDA S. 2(oo)(bb), IDA S. 25 Service Matter Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(oo), 25 - 240 ...
Industrial Disputes Act S. 25 – Delay
Delay cannot itself be sufficient reason to reject an industrial dispute, nevertheless the delay cannot be unreasonable U.P. State Road ...
Guarantor – ‘Agreement-cum-Pledge’ Deed – Liable – Board resolution
Guarantor - Court was concerned with the question whether Lunar Finance Ltd. was only a pledgor of certain shares or also ...
GLOBAL INFOSYSTEM LTD v. LUNAR FINANCE LTD. – 2012 PLRonline 5003
2012 PLRonline 5003Download HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Present : Justice Justice Manmohan. M/S. GLOBAL INFOSYSTEM LTD. ..... ...
Guarantor – alone could have been sued, without even suing the principal debtor, so long as the creditor satisfies the court that the principal debtor is in default
"14. In Pollock & Mulla on Indian Contract and Specific Relief Act, Tenth Edition, at page 728 it is observed thus: ...