a litigant is not entitled to choose the personnel of the Court to hear his case, nor can he insist upon an adjournment of the case because the date fixed for hearing is not convenient to his counsel. Convenience of counsel must subserve the larger interest of the administration of justice. … R. Viswanathan v. Rukn-ul-Mulk Syed…
…
subscribe TO CONTINUE READING …… !!!! SPECIAL LIMITED TIME OFFER !!!!
Subscribe Punjab Law Reporter @ Rs 2800/- and get PLRonline.IN (including Supreme Court) FREE for 1 year (save Rs 600/-)
Login or
Join Now
Full Text of Judgments / Headnotes / PDF is available in Premium Membership | Email punjablawreporter@gmail.com | 9463598502 | Trial membership for 7 days |
SUBSCRIBE