PLRonline.in

This principle was reiterated in the case of Coca-Cola Company of Canada Ltd. v. Pepsi-Cola Company of Canada Ltd. AIR 1942 ...

Judgment not inter partes – Truth of the matter decided a judgment is not admissible evidence against one who is a stranger to the suit

Maharaja Sir Kesho Prasad Singh Bahadur v. Bahuria Mt. Bhagjogna Kuer AIR 1937 PC 69 the Privy Council made the following observations ...

Judgment not inter partes – findings in judgments not inter partes are not admissible in evidence.

Gadadhar Chowdhury v. Sarat Chandra Chakravarty AIR 1941 Cal 193 it was held that findings in judgments not inter partes are ...

Judgment not inter partes

Gujja Lall v. Fatteh Lall ILR 1881 6 Cal 171 a Full Bench exhaustively considered the ambit and scope of Sections 40 to ...

Judgment not inter partes

In John Cokrane v. Hurrosoondurri Debia 1854-57 6 MIA 494 Lord Justice Bruce while dealing with the question of admissibility of a judgment ...

1983 PLRonline 0004

16

1983 PLRonline 0004Download 1983 PLRonline 0004 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before: Justice S M Fazalali and Justice Syed Murtaza STATE ...

Dictionaries can always be referred to in order to ascertain not only the meaning of a word but also the general use of it.

Coca-Cola Company of Canada Ltd. v. Pepsi-Cola Company of Canada Ltd. AIR 1942 PC 40 it was clearly held that Dictionaries ...

Evidence Act. S. 35 – Probative value of a document is concerned, it is reduced to the minimum where there is no evidence to disclose the nature of the instructions given to the author of the document.

. In Brain v. Preece 1843 152 ER 1016 Lord C.B Abinger made the following observations: “The case of the attorney, in Doe d. Patteshall ...

Evidence – Document made by a deceased person can only be admitted where it is clearly shown that they relate to an act or acts done by the deceased person and not by third parties.

Rupert Cross in his book Evidence (1967, 3rd Edn.) at p. 408: “Entries by a solicitor's clerk may, of course, ...

Evidence – A report based on hearsay evidence or on the information given by an illiterate person cannot be admissible even under Section 35 of the Evidence Act.

A report based on hearsay evidence or on the information given by an illiterate person cannot be admissible even under Section ...

Evidence – A report based on hearsay evidence or on the information given by an illiterate person cannot be admissible even under Section 35 of the Evidence Act.

A report based on hearsay evidence or on the information given by an illiterate person cannot be admissible even under Section ...

Evidence – Report of the Collectors may not be of great judicial authority so far as the opinions expressed on private rights of the parties but being the reports made under a statutory Regulation they were entitled to be of considerable importance.

Rajah Muttu Ramalinga Setupati v. Perianayagum Pillai, 1874 1 IA 209 the Privy Council was dealing with reports made by Collectors acting ...

Evidence – Document which while being an entry in a public record is of great probative value and carries the utmost weight.

Meer Usd-oollah v. Beeby Imaman, widow of Shah Khadim Hoossain, 1836-37 1 MIA 19 appears to us to be a clear illustration ...

Evidence – official document prepared by a public authority in pursuance of a statutory duty,

Kuar Shyam Pratap Singh v. Collector of Etawah AIR 1946 PC 103 where the Privy Council made the following observations: “This document ...

Evidence Act S. 35 and exception to the rule of hearsay evidence