. In Brain v. Preece 1843 152 ER 1016 Lord C.B Abinger made the following observations: “The case of the attorney, in Doe d. Patteshall v. Turfored 1832 3 B & Ad 890 stands on precisely the same grounds as that of Price v. Torrington 1703 Holt KB 300. There it was proved that the notices were written, and that the attorney had gone…
… SUBSCRIBE TO CONTINUE READING …… !!!! SPECIAL LIMITED TIME OFFER !!!!
Subscribe Punjab Law Reporter @ Rs 2800/- and get PLRonline.IN (including Supreme Court) FREE for 1 year (save Rs 600/-)
Login or
Join Now
Full Text of Judgments / Headnotes / PDF is available in Premium Membership | Email punjablawreporter@gmail.com | 9463598502 | Trial membership for 7 days |
SUBSCRIBE