Escheat – Claim of – Public Notice
Escheat – Claim of - It is well settled that when a claim of escheat is put forward by the ...
Quote: No mortal person whether he be a Judge or a jurist can ever claim to be infallible
Quote: No mortal person whether he be a Judge or a jurist can ever claim to be infallible and all ...
Judgments not inter partes are inadmissible in evidence
Judgments not inter partes are inadmissible in evidence barring exceptional cases - Under the Evidence Act a judgment which is ...
Judgment in rem
Judgment in rem - Like judgments passed in Probate, insolvency, matrimonial or guardianship or other similar proceedings, is admissible in ...
Evidence – Judgment – Admissibility of
Evidence Act, S. 40, S. 41 S. 42, S. 43, S. 13 - Judgments of courts are admissible in evidence ...
Evidence – Judgment – Admissibility of
Evidence Act, S. 32, Evidence Act, S. 32(5), Judgment – Admissibility of - (1) A judgment in rem e.g judgments ...
Human memory – Imperfections and infirmities of
Evidence Act S. 32(5) Human memory - Imperfections and infirmities of Indeed, as a mortal man is not infallible so ...
Pedigree – Principles for the appraisement of pedigree evidence
Evidence Act S. 32(5) Taylor on Treatise on Evidence has pointed out in para 648 at p. 414 that the ...
Pedigree – Proof of.
Evidence Act S. 32(5) Abdul Ghafur v. Hussain Bibi AIR 1931 PC 45 the Privy Council briefly summed up the law ...
Pedigree – Manner in which a pedigree could be proved
Evidence Act S. 32(5) In Mewa Singh v. Basant Singh AIR 1918 PC 49 the Privy Council made very apt and valuable ...
In order to be admissible the statement relied on must be made ante litem motam by persons who are dead i.e before the commencement of any controversy actual or legal upon the same point
Evidence Act S. 32(5) Kalidindi Venkata Subbaraju & Others v. Chintalapati Subbaraju & Others AIR 1968 SC 947 while construing the provisions ...
Admissible evidence – ante litem motam
Evidence Act S. 32(5) Debi Pershad Chowdhry v. Rani Radha Chowdhrain, 1904 31 IA 160 the law on the subject was very ...
Statements or declarations made post litem motam , inadmissible
Evidence Act S. 32(5) Kalka Parshad v. Mathura Parshad ILR 1908 30 All 510 the Privy Council refused to accept a pedigree ...
Statements or declarations before persons of competent knowledge made ante litem motam are receivable to prove ancient rights of a public or general nature
Evidence Act S. 32(5) Statements or declarations before persons of competent knowledge made ante litem motam are receivable to prove ...
No judgment which was not inter partes or the one to which neither the plaintiff nor the defendant were parties could be used in evidence for any purpose
Full Bench of the Madras High Court in Tripurana Seethapathi Rao Dora v. Rokkam Venkanna Dora AIR 1922 Mad 71 where Kumaraswami Sastri, ...