Mistake of the court – The judge had jurisdiction to correct his own error without entering into a discussion of the grounds taken by the decreeholder or the objections raised by the judgmentdebtors.

HMA – COI Art. 142 – Transfer Petition – Irretrievable breakdown of marriage – Mutual consent divorce granted. [2023 SCeJ 0234]

Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 28 – Lambardar – Appointment of – Age – Is a relevant factor . [PLRonline 119102]

Execution – Limitation – Filed after 12 years.. [PLRonline 114800]

Companies Act, S. 250 – Striking off – Even after dissolution of the company in view of striking off its name from the register, its existence remains only for the purpose of realising the amount due to the company or for the payment or discharge of the liabilities or obligations of the company. [2023 PLRonline 0101 (NCLAT)]

NIA S. 138 – Conviction – courts should, unless there are special circumstances, in all cases of conviction, uniformly exercise the power to levy fine upto twice the cheque amount keeping in view the cheque amount and the simple interest thereon at nine per cent per annum [2014 PLRonline 0208 (SC)]

Criminal Trial – Circumstantial evidence – Chain of evidence must be so complete as to not leave any reasonable grounds for a conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused; the accused ‘must be’ and not merely ‘may be’ guilty, before the Court can convict. [2023 SCeJ 0226 = 2023 PLRonline 437602 (SC)]

IPC – Grevious hurt – The injuries were not intended to cause death but were sufficient to cause grievous injury. It was not a premeditated act – The scissors used by the appellant were little scissors used by tailors. [2023 PLRonline 0100]

Inference – Adverse inference

CPC S. 24 – Cardinal principle for exercise of power under S. 24 is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer. (2022-4)208 PLR 512 (SC), 2023 SCeJ 0223

IPC S. 149 – When five persons were specifically named in the FIR and five persons are facing the trial may be separately, Section 149 IPC would be attracted – FIR- Delay of 3 ½ days – Properly explained. [2023 SupremeCourtOnline 0009]

Chennai City Police Act, 1888 – Police Act, 1861 [2023 PLRonline 9003]

DNA – Evidentiary value of blood tests for determining paternity

Mistake of the court – The judge had jurisdiction to correct his own error without entering into a discussion of the grounds taken by the decreeholder or the objections raised by the judgmentdebtors.

Mistake of the court – The judge had jurisdiction to correct his own error without entering into a discussion of the grounds taken by the decreeholder or the objections raised by the judgmentdebtors.

HMA – COI Art. 142 – Transfer Petition – Irretrievable breakdown of marriage – Mutual consent divorce granted. [2023 SCeJ 0234]

Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 28 – Lambardar – Appointment of – Age – Is a relevant factor . [PLRonline 119102]

Execution – Limitation – Filed after 12 years.. [PLRonline 114800]

IPC – Grevious hurt – The injuries were not intended to cause death but were sufficient to cause grievous injury. It was not a premeditated act – The scissors used by the appellant were little scissors used by tailors. [2023 PLRonline 0100]

Inference – Adverse inference

CPC S. 24 – Cardinal principle for exercise of power under S. 24 is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer. (2022-4)208 PLR 512 (SC), 2023 SCeJ 0223

IPC S. 149 – When five persons were specifically named in the FIR and five persons are facing the trial may be separately, Section 149 IPC would be attracted – FIR- Delay of 3 ½ days – Properly explained. [2023 SupremeCourtOnline 0009]

Chennai City Police Act, 1888 – Police Act, 1861 [2023 PLRonline 9003]

DNA – Evidentiary value of blood tests for determining paternity

Mistake of the court – The judge had jurisdiction to correct his own error without entering into a discussion of the grounds taken by the decreeholder or the objections raised by the judgmentdebtors.

Mistake of the court – The judge had jurisdiction to correct his own error without entering into a discussion of the grounds taken by the decree­holder or the objections raised by the judgment­debtors.

Mistake of the court – The judge had jurisdiction to correct his own error without entering into a discussion of the grounds taken by the decreeholder or the objections raised by the judgmentdebtors.