Matrimonial - If the parties have settled their differences and executed agreement, satisfaction of the decree has to be certified in the manner indicated under Order XXI Rule 2

cpc O.21 R.2

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908), Order XXI Rule 2 – Execution filed to recover past maintenance payable to the wife – Husband’s objection that after the decree, an agreement has been executed between the judgment debtor and the decree holder and the decree holder was permitted to reside along with the judgment debtor and therefore, the decree is inexecutable – Execution Court overruled the objection – If the parties have settled their differences and executed agreement, satisfaction of the decree has to be certified in the manner indicated under Order XXI Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – In the absence of any certification of the satisfaction of the decree in a manner laid down under the law, the judgment debtor cannot object the execution of the decree pointing out the settlement between the parties – Order upheld.

2021 PLRonline 1220

Tags: CPC O.21 R.2 Settlement

Matrimonial – If the parties have settled their differences and executed agreement, satisfaction of the decree has to be certified in the manner indicated under Order XXI Rule 2

Environment law – Principles enunciated – Brick kiln. PLRonline 432610

Environment – It is the duty of the Government as also the Court to protect and preserve the environment

Rent Act – Mesne profits – After passing of decree of eviction landlord is entitled for mesne profits or compensation – Basis of determination of the amount of mesne profit

Angoori Devi v. Smt. Satya Bhama, 2016 PLRonline 0104

Vardhman Holdings Ltd. v. Ranbir Singh, 2014 PLRonline 0203

Rent Act – Mesne profits – Pendency of the appeal Tenant is liable to pay mesne profit or compensation for use and occupation

Rent Act – Mesne Profits – Once a decree for possession has been passed and execution is delayed it is necessary for the Appellate Court to fix reasonable mesne profits

Tenancy – Bona fide need – Leave to defend – Not granted – Delhi Rent Control Act, S. 14(1)(e). PLRonline 313402 (Del.)

CPC S. 10 – Rent Act – Rent is not required to go into the serious question of title – S. 10 is not applicable.

CPC S. 10 – Is referable to a suit instituted in the civil Court and it cannot apply to proceedings of other nature instituted under any other statute – Not open to the High Court to bye-pass Section 10 CPC by invoking Section 151 CPC.

National Institute of Mental Health & Neuro Sciences v. C. Parameshwara, 2014 PLRonline 0202

CPC S. 151 – Cannot be exercised so as to nullify the provisions of the Code

Settlement - Any mode of satisfaction of the decree will have to be certified in a manner indicated under Order XXI Rule 2 of CPC

NIA S. 138 - cheques were given by way of security

Matrimonial – If the parties have settled their differences and executed agreement, satisfaction of the decree has to be certified in the manner indicated under Order XXI Rule 2

Related Posts

CPC S. 10 – Rent Act – Rent is not required to go into the serious question of title – S. 10 is not applicable.

CPC S. 10 – Is referable to a suit instituted in the civil Court and it cannot apply to proceedings of other nature instituted under any other statute – Not open to the High Court to bye-pass Section 10 CPC by invoking Section 151 CPC.

CPC S. 151 – Cannot be exercised so as to nullify the provisions of the Code

Welcome Back!

Create New Account!

Retrieve your password

Save PLRonline.in APP!