IPC S. 149 – Byestander – Mere fact that the appellant was not brave enough to conceal where the victim was hiding did not make him a part of the unlawful assembly.

IPC S. 149 – Mere fact that the appellant was not brave enough to conceal where the victim was hiding did not make him a part of the unlawful assembly. Held, presence of the appellant is explained at the early hours in the morning because of his house being almost adjacent to where the deceased...

P & H High Court judgment : requires you to be logged in with PLRonline.in / Punjab Law Reporter subscription. SUPREME COURT judgment : requires you to be logged in with SUPREMECOURTonline.in / Supreme Court e@Journal subscription. This content is for Trial Membership (Full access for 10 days), Punjab Law Reporter (subscribers-only), and Supreme Court e@Journal - (subscribers only - 1 calendar year) members only.
Login Join Now Full text Judgments is for members only.
JOIN TRIAL MEMBERSHIP or email at plr@plronline.in or call 9463598502 Trial membership : Full site 21 days Punjab Law Reporter subscribers (@Rs 3400/- for 2022) : 1 year subscription to PLR ( monthly parts) + SCe@Journal Subscription 2023 + Full site subscription for www.SupremeCourtonline.in (BEST OFFER !!! you save 1900/-)) Supreme Court E@Journal (@Rs 1500/- for 2023) : 1 year subscription to SCe@Journal Subscription 2023 + subscription for www.SupremeCourtonline.in ( except Punjab Law Reporter reported cases)

Tags: IPC S. 149, IPC S. 149 - bystander

Tags: IPC S. 149 IPC S. 149 - bystander

IPC S. 149 – Byestander – Mere fact that the appellant was not brave enough to conceal where the victim was hiding did not make him a part of the unlawful assembly.

IPC S. 34 – Common Intention – Can be formed even in the course of the incident – Would come into play where participation of the accused in a crime is proved and the common intention is also established. [PLRonline 482604]

Consumer Protection Act – Stocks and shares – Invesment in – Complainant is not a Consumer – It is not the case of the Complainant that he had invested the money in share market exclusively for earning his livelihood. [2022 PLRonline 0596 (NCDRC)]

NIA S. 138 – Liability of Joint Account Holders – There is no provision for taking cognizance against a person other than the “drawer” of the cheque. [(2023-4)212 PLR 177]

Court proceedings – Videography – Whether would amount to criminal contempt of court ? [(2023-4)212 PLR 163]

Court proceedings – Videography – Court proceedings in the High Court or any other Court subordinate thereto cannot be videotaped, photographed or telecast without taking prior written permission from the High Court. [PLRonline]

NDPS S. 2 (viia) read with the notification S.O. No. 1055 (E) dated 19/10/2001 , Section 37, 52A – “commercial quantity” – Weight Adjustment due to Drying – Weight recorded during inventory before the Magistrate considered – Bail Consideration for Multiple Accused. [PLRonline 413680]

[SC] CPC O. 7 R. 11 – Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Order 7 Rule 11 – Assessment of Plaints – Court should not engage in assessing the correctness or merits of the plaint’s averments – Court made an error by partially rejecting the plaint . [PLRonline 416680]

[SC] Insurance – Surveyor’s report – Not relied – Reliance by surveyor on forensic report – Claim payable.

[SC] Insurance – Surveyor’s report, though important, is not absolute and not binding on the parties – It is not that sacrosanct that it cannot be departed from; it is not conclusive. [ PLRonline 368351]

IT Act S. 67(A) – Posted on Instagram 4-5 pictures of petitioner kissing the complainant on her cheek – Bail granted. [2022 PLRonline 0595]

IPC S. 149 - Criminal Trial - Constructive liability of innocent bystander

MVA S. 163-A - In a proceeding under Section 163A of the Act it is not open for the Insurer to raise any defence of negligence on the part of the victim

IPC S. 149 – Byestander – Mere fact that the appellant was not brave enough to conceal where the victim was hiding did not make him a part of the unlawful assembly.

Related Posts

RAJNESH V. NEHA, (2020-4)200 PLR 793 (SC), 2020 SCeJ 2087, 2020 PLRonline 4498300

RAVINDER KAUR GREWAL V. MANJIT KAUR, 2019 SCeJ 892, (2019-3)195 PLR 584 (SC)(SN) , 2019 PLRonline 203208

Mathew Varghese v. M. Amritha Kumar

Welcome Back!

Create New Account!

Retrieve your password

Save PLRonline.in APP!