- Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977, Section 17 allows for the resumption of plots in cases of non-payment of installments.
- Resumption should be the last resort according to the Act.
- Authorities have a duty to determine whether the default was willful or deliberate.
- The appellate authority dismissed the appeal based solely on the ground of limitation without considering the question of willful or deliberate default.
- More than half of the plot price has been paid, indicating that there is no deliberate attempt to avoid payment.
- The petitioners are willing to make the payment.
- The court sets aside the harsh resumption order, subject to the payment of all outstanding dues for the plot, including penalties.
- 2014 PLRonline 0209
- Full Judgment with detailed headnotes for Online Subscribers (opens automatically) (Click to subscribe Trial Pack)
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
HUDA – Plot – Resumption of – Non-payment of installment–Resumption should be last resort – Authorities to see whether or not the default was ‘willful’ or ‘deliberate’. [ID 310702]
0
