Latest

Ad Hoc employees termination – Replacement with other Ad Hoc employees

Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act S. 13(3)(a)(i) – Bonafide requirement – fact that the respondent-landlord has got vacated other premises in the same building, would not debar the landlord from seeking eviction of the other tenant as well.

CPC O. 11 R. 1 and 4 – Interrogatories – Interrogatories must have a reasonably close connection with the “matters in question” , cannot be refused on the grounds that there are other means of proving the fact in question, Interrogatories that favor the case of the applicant and damage/destroy the case of the opponent would be admissible, service of interrogatories can allowed at any stage of the suit. [PLRonline 324702]

Sarfaesi – No proceeding U/s 13(4) – Writ maintainable – Overcharging of interest by Bank – Sarfaesi set aside – NPA could not be continued if account was regularised. [2022 PLRonline 0594]

SC issues notice to RBI a. qua handing over of loan documents b. change in RATE OF INTEREST applicable to loans c. furnishing yearly STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS to account holders

CrPC S. 391, 311 – NIA S. 138 – Leading additional defence evidence and re-calling the respondent/complainant for cross-examination. [2019 PLRonline 3507]

MVA – Criminal case – Acquittal in a criminal case – Effect on claim petition

Decree – Setting aside exparte decree – Knowledge – applicant must have knowledge not merely that a decree has been passed by some Court against him, but that a particular decree has been passed to against him in a particular Court in favour of a particular person for a particular sum. [1967 PLRonline 0001 (SC)]

Companies Act, 1956 Section 81 , 441, 629A – Tribunal (NCLT) has all the powers to compound all the offences irrespective of any pecuniary limit. [2023 PLRonline 0112]

SARFAESI – High Court u/s 482 Cr.P.C can not quash Order passed under S. 14 of the SARFAESI ACT – Any remedy against such order can be availed only under the SARFAESI ACT, 2002. [SupremeCourtOnline 456603]

Right to Information Act – Duty of public authorities – Direct that the Central Information Commission and the State Information Commissions – Shall continuously monitor the implementation of the mandate of Section 4 of the Act as also prescribed by the Department of Personnel and Training in its Guidelines and Memorandums issued from time to time.

IPC S. 498A – Cruelty – Non-providing of proper medical aid is cruelty. [ 2023 PLRonline 419673]

Banking – Forged DD – Liability of person presenting the same – Plaintiff Bank has passed the Demand Daft being received by way of collection by another bank – U/s 72 of the Contract Act, person receiving proceeds from forged draft liable to refund the money to the bank . [ID 317402]

NIA S. 148 – CrPC S. 389 – Condition of deposit when an accused applies for suspension of sentence under Section 389 – Typically, the accused applies for relief without any conditions – If a blanket order is sought, the court must determine if the case falls under the exception of Section 148 – Impugned orders have been set aside. [(2023-3)211 PLR 260 (SC)]

MVA S. 163-A – U/s 163-A compensation is payable to a third party only – Deceased borrower of the vehicle cannot be considered a third party – Allowed Additional Personal Accident Cover as premium was paid. [(2023-3)211 PLR 228]

Login
Register

PLRonline.in

Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act S. 13(1-A) - Order passed by the Rent Controller under Section 13(1-A), has been made non-appealable by the statute

Deed of guarantee - Oral - Although, there is no performa is prescribed for deed of guarantee and even guarantee can be oral as per Section 126 of the Contract Act, but once it is reduced into writing either in the form of letter or contract then it must fulfil all the ingredients of contract of guarantee and should be signed by surety, principal debtor and creditor as well

Home Punjab & Haryana

Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act S. 13(3)(a)(i) – Bonafide requirement – fact that the respondent-landlord has got vacated other premises in the same building, would not debar the landlord from seeking eviction of the other tenant as well.

in Punjab & Haryana, Tenancy and Rent Act

Share on Telegram Share on Twitter Share on Whatsapp Share on eMail

Related Posts

Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, S. 23 – Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1976, R. 7 – CPC O. 18, R. 3A – Eviction petition – Strict provisions of CPC shall not apply to the proceedings under the Act and only those provisions of the Code shall be made applicable, which the Act specifically provides – Provisions of Rule 3A Order 18 of CPC shall not apply to the proceedings under the Rent Act. [ID 217802]

Tenancy and Rent Act

[SC] East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act 1949, Section 13 – Constitution of India, 1950, Article 133 – Eviction – Suit for – Concurrent findings – Revision was also dismissed on the ground that there was no perversity or infirmity in the orders of the Tribunals below – Dismissed. [ID 214102]

Tenancy and Rent Act

Personal necessity of landlord – Held, landlord whose wish has to prevail in respect of property in which he wants to carry on his business. Tenant has nothing to do in forming such an opinion by the landlord, nor the tenant can direct the landlord to carry on business in a particular premises. [ID 319901]

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Login
Sign Up

×

Click for support Team PLRonline