Dharam Pal v. State Of Haryana , 2013 PLRonline 0103

Supreme Court of India Altamas Kabir, Surinder Singh Nijjar, Ranjan Gogoi, M.Y. Eqbal, Vikramajit Sen Dharam Pal v. State Of Haryana Criminal Appeal No. 148 of 2003 With Criminal Appeal Nos. 865 of 2004, 1334 of 2005 and 537 of 2006 18 July, 2013 CrPC S. 193 – Power under Section 193 of the Code...

P & H High Court judgment : requires you to be logged in with PLRonline.in / Punjab Law Reporter subscription. SUPREME COURT judgment : requires you to be logged in with SUPREMECOURTonline.in / Supreme Court e@Journal subscription. This content is for Trial Membership (Full access for 10 days), Punjab Law Reporter (subscribers-only), and Supreme Court e@Journal - (subscribers only - 1 calendar year) members only.
Login Join Now Full text Judgments is for members only.
JOIN TRIAL MEMBERSHIP or email at plr@plronline.in or call 9463598502 Trial membership : Full site 21 days Punjab Law Reporter subscribers (@Rs 3400/- for 2022) : 1 year subscription to PLR ( monthly parts) + SCe@Journal Subscription 2023 + Full site subscription for www.SupremeCourtonline.in (BEST OFFER !!! you save 1900/-)) Supreme Court E@Journal (@Rs 1500/- for 2023) : 1 year subscription to SCe@Journal Subscription 2023 + subscription for www.SupremeCourtonline.in ( except Punjab Law Reporter reported cases)

Tags: (2004) 13 SCC 9, (2014) 3 SCC 306, 2013 PLRonline 0103, Dharam Pal v. State Of Haryana

Tags: (2004) 13 SCC 9 (2014) 3 SCC 306 2013 PLRonline 0103 Dharam Pal v. State Of Haryana

Dharam Pal v. State Of Haryana , 2013 PLRonline 0103

IPC S. 34 – Common Intention – Can be formed even in the course of the incident – Would come into play where participation of the accused in a crime is proved and the common intention is also established. [PLRonline 482604]

Consumer Protection Act – Stocks and shares – Invesment in – Complainant is not a Consumer – It is not the case of the Complainant that he had invested the money in share market exclusively for earning his livelihood. [2022 PLRonline 0596 (NCDRC)]

NIA S. 138 – Liability of Joint Account Holders – There is no provision for taking cognizance against a person other than the “drawer” of the cheque. [(2023-4)212 PLR 177]

Court proceedings – Videography – Whether would amount to criminal contempt of court ? [(2023-4)212 PLR 163]

Court proceedings – Videography – Court proceedings in the High Court or any other Court subordinate thereto cannot be videotaped, photographed or telecast without taking prior written permission from the High Court. [PLRonline]

NDPS S. 2 (viia) read with the notification S.O. No. 1055 (E) dated 19/10/2001 , Section 37, 52A – “commercial quantity” – Weight Adjustment due to Drying – Weight recorded during inventory before the Magistrate considered – Bail Consideration for Multiple Accused. [PLRonline 413680]

[SC] CPC O. 7 R. 11 – Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Order 7 Rule 11 – Assessment of Plaints – Court should not engage in assessing the correctness or merits of the plaint’s averments – Court made an error by partially rejecting the plaint . [PLRonline 416680]

[SC] Insurance – Surveyor’s report – Not relied – Reliance by surveyor on forensic report – Claim payable.

[SC] Insurance – Surveyor’s report, though important, is not absolute and not binding on the parties – It is not that sacrosanct that it cannot be departed from; it is not conclusive. [ PLRonline 368351]

IT Act S. 67(A) – Posted on Instagram 4-5 pictures of petitioner kissing the complainant on her cheek – Bail granted. [2022 PLRonline 0595]

CPA - Auction Purchaser

Dharam Pal v. State Of Haryana , 2013 PLRonline 0103

Related Posts

RAJNESH V. NEHA, (2020-4)200 PLR 793 (SC), 2020 SCeJ 2087, 2020 PLRonline 4498300

RAVINDER KAUR GREWAL V. MANJIT KAUR, 2019 SCeJ 892, (2019-3)195 PLR 584 (SC)(SN) , 2019 PLRonline 203208

Mathew Varghese v. M. Amritha Kumar

Welcome Back!

Create New Account!

Retrieve your password

Save PLRonline.in APP!