CPC O. 9 R. 13 – Setting aside exparte judgment – Resident of Canada and the plaintiff had not given her correct address of that country – Setting aside upheld. 2022 PLRonline 8454

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908) Order 9, Rule 13 – Setting aside exparte judgment – Case that she happens to be a resident of Canada and the plaintiff had not given her correct address of that country resultantly, she was never served in that case, as such could not put in appearance when so summoned by the trial Court - There is not much delay in filing the application - The trial Court by analysing the stand taken by the contestants, in support of which they had led evidence, had found sufficient grounds to set aside the exparte judgment and decree - Order upheld.

P & H High Court judgment : requires you to be logged in with PLRonline.in / Punjab Law Reporter subscription.SUPREME COURT judgment : requires you to be logged in with SUPREMECOURTonline.in / Supreme Court e@Journal subscription.This content is for Trial Membership (Full access for 10 days), Punjab Law Reporter (subscribers-only), and Supreme Court e@Journal - (subscribers only - 1 calendar year) members only.
Login Join NowFull text Judgments is for members only.
JOIN TRIAL MEMBERSHIP or email at plr@plronline.in or call 9463598502Trial membership : Full site 21 daysPunjab Law Reporter subscribers (@Rs 3400/- for 2022) : 1 year subscription to PLR ( monthly parts) + SCe@Journal Subscription 2023 + Full site subscription for www.SupremeCourtonline.in (BEST OFFER !!! you save 1900/-))Supreme Court E@Journal (@Rs 1500/- for 2023) : 1 year subscription to SCe@Journal Subscription 2023 + subscription for www.SupremeCourtonline.in ( except Punjab Law Reporter reported cases)

Tags: (2022-1)205 PLR 473, 2022 PLRonline 8454, CPC O. 9 R. 13, Exparte decree, MALKIT SINGH v. SURJIT KAUR

CPC O. 9 R. 13 – Setting aside exparte judgment – Resident of Canada and the plaintiff had not given her correct address of that country – Setting aside upheld. 2022 PLRonline 8454

HMA – COI Art. 142 – Transfer Petition – Irretrievable breakdown of marriage – Mutual consent divorce granted. [2023 SCeJ 0234]

Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 28 – Lambardar – Appointment of – Age – Is a relevant factor . [PLRonline 119102]

Execution – Limitation – Filed after 12 years.. [PLRonline 114800]

IPC – Grevious hurt – The injuries were not intended to cause death but were sufficient to cause grievous injury. It was not a premeditated act – The scissors used by the appellant were little scissors used by tailors. [2023 PLRonline 0100]

Inference – Adverse inference

CPC S. 24 – Cardinal principle for exercise of power under S. 24 is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer. (2022-4)208 PLR 512 (SC), 2023 SCeJ 0223

IPC S. 149 – When five persons were specifically named in the FIR and five persons are facing the trial may be separately, Section 149 IPC would be attracted – FIR- Delay of 3 ½ days – Properly explained. [2023 SupremeCourtOnline 0009]

Chennai City Police Act, 1888 – Police Act, 1861 [2023 PLRonline 9003]

DNA – Evidentiary value of blood tests for determining paternity

MVA S. 166 - FIR - Delay in lodging - Cannot be given much weightage in proceedings for determining compensation payable in a petition under S 166 . 2022 PLRonline 8654

CPC O. 1 R. 15, O. 6 R. 17 – Amendment – Nature of suit is sought to be changed by turning it into a suit for declaration and permanent injunction instead of the original suit for permanent injunction only - Dismissal upheld. 2022 PLRonline 8254

CPC O. 9 R. 13 – Setting aside exparte judgment – Resident of Canada and the plaintiff had not given her correct address of that country – Setting aside upheld. 2022 PLRonline 8454

Related Posts

CPC S. 24 – Cardinal principle for exercise of power under S. 24 is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer. (2022-4)208 PLR 512 (SC), 2023 SCeJ 0223

CPC O. 21 R. 97, 99 and 101 – Impleadment in execution proceedings – All questions relating to right, title or interest and relevant shall have to be determined by the Court dealing with the application. [2022 PLRonline 1429504, 2022 SCeJ 1418]

CPC O. 21 R. 102 clarifies that Rule 98 and Rule 100 do not apply in cases where resistance or obstruction in the execution of a decree is offered by a transferee pendente-lite. [2022 SCeJ 1409, 2022 PLRonline 1410504]

Welcome Back!

Create New Account!

Retrieve your password

Save PLRonline.in APP!