CPC O. 9 R. 13 – Setting aside exparte judgment – Resident of Canada and the plaintiff had not given her correct address of that country – Setting aside upheld. 2022 PLRonline 8454

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908) Order 9, Rule 13 – Setting aside exparte judgment – Case that she happens to be a resident of Canada and the plaintiff had not given her correct address of that country resultantly, she was never served in that case, as such could not put in appearance when so summoned by the trial Court - There is not much delay in filing the application - The trial Court by analysing the stand taken by the contestants, in support of which they had led evidence, had found sufficient grounds to set aside the exparte judgment and decree - Order upheld.

P & H High Court judgment : requires you to be logged in with PLRonline.in / Punjab Law Reporter subscription. SUPREME COURT judgment : requires you to be logged in with SUPREMECOURTonline.in / Supreme Court e@Journal subscription. This content is for Trial Membership (Full access for 10 days), Punjab Law Reporter (subscribers-only), and Supreme Court e@Journal - (subscribers only - 1 calendar year) members only.
Login Join Now Full text Judgments is for members only.
JOIN TRIAL MEMBERSHIP or email at plr@plronline.in or call 9463598502 Trial membership : Full site 21 days Punjab Law Reporter subscribers (@Rs 3400/- for 2022) : 1 year subscription to PLR ( monthly parts) + SCe@Journal Subscription 2023 + Full site subscription for www.SupremeCourtonline.in (BEST OFFER !!! you save 1900/-)) Supreme Court E@Journal (@Rs 1500/- for 2023) : 1 year subscription to SCe@Journal Subscription 2023 + subscription for www.SupremeCourtonline.in ( except Punjab Law Reporter reported cases)

Tags: (2022-1)205 PLR 473, 2022 PLRonline 8454, CPC O. 9 R. 13, Exparte decree, MALKIT SINGH v. SURJIT KAUR

CPC O. 9 R. 13 – Setting aside exparte judgment – Resident of Canada and the plaintiff had not given her correct address of that country – Setting aside upheld. 2022 PLRonline 8454

IPC S. 34 – Common Intention – Can be formed even in the course of the incident – Would come into play where participation of the accused in a crime is proved and the common intention is also established. [PLRonline 482604]

Consumer Protection Act – Stocks and shares – Invesment in – Complainant is not a Consumer – It is not the case of the Complainant that he had invested the money in share market exclusively for earning his livelihood. [2022 PLRonline 0596 (NCDRC)]

NIA S. 138 – Liability of Joint Account Holders – There is no provision for taking cognizance against a person other than the “drawer” of the cheque. [(2023-4)212 PLR 177]

Court proceedings – Videography – Whether would amount to criminal contempt of court ? [(2023-4)212 PLR 163]

Court proceedings – Videography – Court proceedings in the High Court or any other Court subordinate thereto cannot be videotaped, photographed or telecast without taking prior written permission from the High Court. [PLRonline]

NDPS S. 2 (viia) read with the notification S.O. No. 1055 (E) dated 19/10/2001 , Section 37, 52A – “commercial quantity” – Weight Adjustment due to Drying – Weight recorded during inventory before the Magistrate considered – Bail Consideration for Multiple Accused. [PLRonline 413680]

[SC] CPC O. 7 R. 11 – Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Order 7 Rule 11 – Assessment of Plaints – Court should not engage in assessing the correctness or merits of the plaint’s averments – Court made an error by partially rejecting the plaint . [PLRonline 416680]

[SC] Insurance – Surveyor’s report – Not relied – Reliance by surveyor on forensic report – Claim payable.

[SC] Insurance – Surveyor’s report, though important, is not absolute and not binding on the parties – It is not that sacrosanct that it cannot be departed from; it is not conclusive. [ PLRonline 368351]

IT Act S. 67(A) – Posted on Instagram 4-5 pictures of petitioner kissing the complainant on her cheek – Bail granted. [2022 PLRonline 0595]

MVA S. 166 - FIR - Delay in lodging - Cannot be given much weightage in proceedings for determining compensation payable in a petition under S 166 . 2022 PLRonline 8654

CPC O. 1 R. 15, O. 6 R. 17 – Amendment – Nature of suit is sought to be changed by turning it into a suit for declaration and permanent injunction instead of the original suit for permanent injunction only - Dismissal upheld. 2022 PLRonline 8254

CPC O. 9 R. 13 – Setting aside exparte judgment – Resident of Canada and the plaintiff had not given her correct address of that country – Setting aside upheld. 2022 PLRonline 8454

Related Posts

[SC] CPC O. 7 R. 11 – Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Order 7 Rule 11 – Assessment of Plaints – Court should not engage in assessing the correctness or merits of the plaint’s averments – Court made an error by partially rejecting the plaint . [PLRonline 416680]

CPC O. 22 R. 3 – Abatement – P&H amendment – Where the legal heirs of the deceased are not brought on record within the prescribed period, the suit shall not abate under O 22 R 3 CPC. [PLRonline 328702]

CPC O. 40 R. 1 – “just and convenient” explained – Receiver is regarded as one of the harshest remedy which the law provides for the enforcement of its rights. [PLRonline.in]

Welcome Back!

Create New Account!

Retrieve your password

Save PLRonline.in APP!