CPC O. 7 R. 11 – Defense in the written statement cannot be gone into – One has to only look into the plaint for the purpose of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11, CPC

cpc O. 7 R. 11- Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order VII Rule 11 – Application claiming rejection of the plaint on the ground that the suit filed by respondent No.1 was barred by res judicata – Plaint in question did not disclose any cause of action – At this stage, the defense in the written statement cannot be gone into – One has to only look into the plaint for the purpose of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11, CPC – It is possible that in a cleverly drafted plaint, the plaintiff has not given the details about the first Suit which has been decided against him – He has totally omitted to mention about the second Suit, the judgment wherein has attained finality – Plaintiff may be guilty of suppression and concealment, if the averments made by the appellant are ultimately found to be correct – However, as per the established principles of law, such a defense projected in the written statement cannot be looked into while deciding application under Order VII Rule 11, CPC – cpc o. 7 r. 11.

(2018)2 SCeJ 1240 = 2018 PLRonline 14192

Download / Print

Tags: CPC O. 7 R. 11, Written Statement

Tags: CPC O. 7 R. 11 Written Statement

CPC O. 7 R. 11 – Defense in the written statement cannot be gone into – One has to only look into the plaint for the purpose of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11, CPC

IPC S. 34 – Common Intention – Can be formed even in the course of the incident – Would come into play where participation of the accused in a crime is proved and the common intention is also established. [PLRonline 482604]

Consumer Protection Act – Stocks and shares – Invesment in – Complainant is not a Consumer – It is not the case of the Complainant that he had invested the money in share market exclusively for earning his livelihood. [2022 PLRonline 0596 (NCDRC)]

NIA S. 138 – Liability of Joint Account Holders – There is no provision for taking cognizance against a person other than the “drawer” of the cheque. [(2023-4)212 PLR 177]

Court proceedings – Videography – Whether would amount to criminal contempt of court ? [(2023-4)212 PLR 163]

Court proceedings – Videography – Court proceedings in the High Court or any other Court subordinate thereto cannot be videotaped, photographed or telecast without taking prior written permission from the High Court. [PLRonline]

NDPS S. 2 (viia) read with the notification S.O. No. 1055 (E) dated 19/10/2001 , Section 37, 52A – “commercial quantity” – Weight Adjustment due to Drying – Weight recorded during inventory before the Magistrate considered – Bail Consideration for Multiple Accused. [PLRonline 413680]

[SC] CPC O. 7 R. 11 – Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Order 7 Rule 11 – Assessment of Plaints – Court should not engage in assessing the correctness or merits of the plaint’s averments – Court made an error by partially rejecting the plaint . [PLRonline 416680]

[SC] Insurance – Surveyor’s report – Not relied – Reliance by surveyor on forensic report – Claim payable.

[SC] Insurance – Surveyor’s report, though important, is not absolute and not binding on the parties – It is not that sacrosanct that it cannot be departed from; it is not conclusive. [ PLRonline 368351]

IT Act S. 67(A) – Posted on Instagram 4-5 pictures of petitioner kissing the complainant on her cheek – Bail granted. [2022 PLRonline 0595]

TPA S. 58(c) - Conditional Sale – Mortgage - Two separate documents executed

Suit - Maintainability of - Trial court may, after framing the issues, take up the issues which pertain to the maintainability of the suit and decide the same in the first instance

CPC O. 7 R. 11 – Defense in the written statement cannot be gone into – One has to only look into the plaint for the purpose of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11, CPC

Related Posts

Consumer Protection Act – Stocks and shares – Invesment in – Complainant is not a Consumer – It is not the case of the Complainant that he had invested the money in share market exclusively for earning his livelihood. [2022 PLRonline 0596 (NCDRC)]

[SC] CPC O. 7 R. 11 – Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Order 7 Rule 11 – Assessment of Plaints – Court should not engage in assessing the correctness or merits of the plaint’s averments – Court made an error by partially rejecting the plaint . [PLRonline 416680]

CPC O. 22 R. 3 – Abatement – P&H amendment – Where the legal heirs of the deceased are not brought on record within the prescribed period, the suit shall not abate under O 22 R 3 CPC. [PLRonline 328702]

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Welcome Back!

Create New Account!

Retrieve your password

Save PLRonline.in APP!