Delay in compliance of order – High Court observed that in the absence of any explanation for the delay, it would amount to wilful and deliberate violation of the order of the Court – Held, proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act are quasi judicial in nature and therefore as the Court comes to a conclusion that the act was neither deliberate or wilful, it could not have convicted the appellants for Contempt of Courts Act.
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
CONTEMPT | Court deems it fit and appropriate to issue a show cause notice upon the Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Chandigarh, for the latter making an explanation to this Court as to why proceedings for contempt be not initiated against him for his making the above miscommunication, which but is prima facie completely ridden with lies. [PLRonline.in]
[SC] Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, S. 13(1)(ia) and (ib) - Divorce - Cruelty and desertion –- Intention on the part of the respondent to resume cohabitation is not established - An inference can be drawn that there was animus deserendi on the part of the wife - Has not pleaded and established any reasonable cause for remaining away from her matrimonial home. [2022 PLRonline 0601]
Contempt of Courts Act – Mere delay in complying with the order, unless there is a deliberate or wilful act on the part of the alleged contemnors would not attract the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act. (2024-1)213 PLR 082 (SC)
0
