“Best-evidence rule”

Punjab Land Revenue Act S. 16 – Financial Commissioner, Haryana, would have the jurisdiction to entertain the revision petition as the proceedings have been initiated in the year 2006.

Local Commissioner – Order refusing to appoint – Not a revisable order. [PLRonline 402605]

Punjab Land Revenue Act, Section 16(1) – Sanad takseem – Order of the Collector being merged in the order of the Commissioner can be assailed only with the Financial Commissioner. [PLRonline 316002]

Order 16 Rule 1 of the CPC is not mandatory but is directory in nature.n [PLRonline 247082]

Land Acquisition Act S. 12(2)- Once the notice under Section 12(2) of the LA Act was issued and served upon the original writ petitioner and he was called upon to collect the compensation and thereafter, when he did not come to collect the compensation and then the compensation was sent to the revenue deposit, thereafter it would not be open for the original writ petitioner to contend that acquisition proceedings have lapsed.[ PLRonline 413600]

Cruelty – Mere filing of a criminal case itself cannot be termed as “cruelty” | Desertion – Having regard to the nature of the allegations made in the complaint cannot be said that the wife had no valid reason to leave the company of the husband. [PLRonline 401605]

Children custody – Best Interest of Child – Scope of – Habeas Corpus – Children natural citizens of USA , are in the grips of their mother – Continuance of present status, will damage their progress in academics, and their emotional quotient. [(2023-1)209 PLRIJ 059]

“Understanding Burden of Proof for Input Tax Credit Claims under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003”

Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja, 2021 PLRonline 9094 (SC)

Hindu Marriage Act, S. 28-A – Enforcement/Execution of orders of maintenance

Hindu Marriage Act, S. 24 – Permanent alimony – Quantum of maintenance – CrPC S. 125

Hindu Marriage Act, S. 24 – Maintenance – Where several marriages last for a short time – Inequitable to direct the contesting spouse to pay permanent alimony to the applicant for the rest of her life – Duration of marriage would be a relevant factor – Permanent alimony

“Best-evidence rule”

PLRonline AI Chat

[class^="wpforms-"]

“Best-evidence rule”

Punjab Land Revenue Act S. 16 – Financial Commissioner, Haryana, would have the jurisdiction to entertain the revision petition as the proceedings have been initiated in the year 2006.

Local Commissioner – Order refusing to appoint – Not a revisable order. [PLRonline 402605]

Punjab Land Revenue Act, Section 16(1) – Sanad takseem – Order of the Collector being merged in the order of the Commissioner can be assailed only with the Financial Commissioner. [PLRonline 316002]

Order 16 Rule 1 of the CPC is not mandatory but is directory in nature.n [PLRonline 247082]

Cruelty – Mere filing of a criminal case itself cannot be termed as “cruelty” | Desertion – Having regard to the nature of the allegations made in the complaint cannot be said that the wife had no valid reason to leave the company of the husband. [PLRonline 401605]

Children custody – Best Interest of Child – Scope of – Habeas Corpus – Children natural citizens of USA , are in the grips of their mother – Continuance of present status, will damage their progress in academics, and their emotional quotient. [(2023-1)209 PLRIJ 059]

“Understanding Burden of Proof for Input Tax Credit Claims under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003”

Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja, 2021 PLRonline 9094 (SC)

Hindu Marriage Act, S. 28-A – Enforcement/Execution of orders of maintenance

Hindu Marriage Act, S. 24 – Permanent alimony – Quantum of maintenance – CrPC S. 125

Hindu Marriage Act, S. 24 – Maintenance – Where several marriages last for a short time – Inequitable to direct the contesting spouse to pay permanent alimony to the applicant for the rest of her life – Duration of marriage would be a relevant factor – Permanent alimony

“Best-evidence rule”