CCS (Pension) Rules R. 54 (14)(b) – Effect of the phrase “in relation to a government servant” [SC]
Doypack Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, (1988) 2 SCC 299 : AIR 1988 SC 782 on the interpretation...
Adoption
As per Sections 8 and 12 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, ('HAMA Act', for short) the widow...
Review – Party can not be left remedy less.
Review - Party can not be left remedy less - No party could be left remediless and whatever the grievance...
Sunil Vasudeva v. Sundar Gupta, 2019 PLRonline 3407 (SC)
PLR PLRonline 2019 PLRonline 3407 . SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (A.M.Khanwilkar and Ajay Rastogi,JJ.,) Sunil Vasudeva v. Sundar Gupta C.A.No.5140...
Review – Basic principles in which the review application could be entertained. [SC]
“20. Thus, in view of the above, the following grounds of review are maintainable as stipulated by the statute: 20.1. ...
Adverse inference – In case a party to a suit does not enter into the witness box, an adverse influence has to be drawn against him/her. [SC]
In case a party to a suit does not enter into the witness box, an adverse influence has to be...
Vidhyadhar v. Manikrao, 1999 PLRonline 0003 (SC)
LogIn required
Service matter – Whether the State Government while exercising power under Rule 6(10) is free to choose any candidate from the panel prepared by the Selection Committee. No.
Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office, resignation and removal of the President...
Kamal Kant v. State of Punjab, (2022-4)208 PLR 692
(2022-4)208 PLR 692 PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT Before: Mr. Justice Mahabir Singh Sindhu. KAMAL KANT and others – Petitioners,...
Public Gambling Act 1867, S. 5 – Investigation in a non-cognizable offence at the hands of the police without permission of the competent Magistrate is impermissible
Public Gambling Act, 1867, S. 5 - Investigation in a non-cognizable offence at the hands of the police without permission...
Saurabh Verma v. State of Punjab, (2022-4)208 PLR 686
(2022-4)208 PLR 686 PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT Before: Justice Aman Chaudhary SAURABH VERMA - Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB...
Criminal Trial – Framing of Charge – Mere mentioning that the charge sheet as also the documents have been gone through, would not suffice.
Criminal Trial – Framing of Charge - By mere mentioning that the charge sheet as also the documents have been...
IPC S. 188 – Where an “offence” is committed under S. 188 of the IPC, it would be mandatory on the part of the public servant concerned to file a complaint in writing before the jurisdictional Magistrate
Section 195 Cr.PC. opens up with the word “No Court” and thus, imposes an express bar for any Court to...
Will – Supicious circumstanes – Laid down
Court enlisted the various suspicious circumstances, however, held that this is not a complete list. The explanation for suspicious circumstances...