will – Suspicious circumstances – Appellant as such became L.R. along with others as an appellant and till then he did not hold out that he was beneficiary of the Will exclusively on the basis of second Will – Appellate Court has rightly held that once there is a long delay in disclosing of existence of registered Will of the property in question the onus as such to explain the delay lies upon the propounder which in the facts and circumstances is not explained.
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
Order – Statute - Omission to refer to the correct section of a statute - Omission to refer to the correct section of a statute does not vitiate an order.
Thumb Impression - Sending of the said documents to an expert for comparison was on account of the fact that there were two contrary reports of Finger Print Experts on record, both by the plaintiffs and defendants - Order upheld
Will – Suspicious circumstances – Once there is a long delay in disclosing of existence of registered Will of the property in question the onus as such to explain the delay lies upon the propounder
0
