SMT. S VANITHA V. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, 2020 SCeJ 2140, (2021-1)201 PLR 117 (SC)
2020 SCeJ 2140, (2021-1)201 PLR 117 (SC) SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before : Justice Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Justice Indu ...
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
Tag: Service provider
Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja, 2021 PLRonline 9094 (SC)
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and M.R. Shah, JJ.) SATISH CHANDER AHUJA - Appellant v. SNEHA ...
Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 S. 22-C(1) Proviso – “relating to an offence”
Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 S. 22-C, (1), Proviso - "relating to an offence" - We will assume that in ...
Service Matter – Out sourcing policy service provider is not an agency of the State
Ms. ShaliniAtri, for the petitioner. Service Matter – Out sourcing policy service provider is not an agency of the State ...
