CPC S. 10 – Rent Act – Rent is not required to go into the serious question of title – S. 10 is not applicable.
CPC S. 10 - Rent Act - Bihar Rent Act is a special Act providing for speedy disposal of eviction ...
Tag: Reasons
National Institute of Mental Health & Neuro Sciences v. C. Parameshwara, 2014 PLRonline 0202
2014 PLRonline 0202 . Supreme Court of India Bench: A Pasayat, S Kapadia National Institute of Mental Health & Neuro ...
Tender – A bid document has to be read as a whole and interpretation has to be based on common trade practices – Responsibility to make the site “available” prima facie has to be construed as “available” for work. PLRonline 437650
he language of the clause is wide and not limited to only an incident of default by the Department - ...
Rashid Wali Beg v. Farid Pindari, 2022 SCeJ 1359
LogIn required
Shri Ram Shridhar Chimurkar v. Union Of India, 2023 SCeJ 008
((2023-1)209 PLR 243 (SC), 2023 SCeJ 008, 2023 PLRonline 419600) SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (K. M. JOSEPH , J. and ...
AMD Industries Limited v. Commissioner of Trade Tax, 2023 SCeJ 002
U.P. Trade Tax Act Section 4-A(2)(c) – “Whether for the goods, manufactured by use of modern technologies can be said ...
Babu Lal v. M/s. Hazari Lal Kishori Lal, 1982 PLRonline 0105 (SC)
PLR PLRonline 1982 PLRonline 0105 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (A. P. SEN,J. and R. B. MISRA,J.) Babu Lal v. M/s. ...
Sarfaesi S. 14 – Remedy under Section 14 of the Act is not rendered redundant if the District Magistrate is unable to handover the possession.
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 14 – Inability to take possession ...
Rajaram v. State Of Madhya Pradesh, 2022 SCeJ 1352
2022 SCeJ 1352 Supreme Court of India Present: Justice Ravindra Bhat, Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia RAJARAM – Appellant, Versus STATE OF ...
DENTAL COUNCIL OF INDIA v. SAILENDRA SHARMA, 2022 SCeJ 965
Supreme Court of India JUSTICE M.R. SHAH JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH DENTAL COUNCIL OF INDIA v. SAILENDRA SHARMA & ORS. CIVIL ...
Reason and Finding
"findings‟ and "reasons‟ in the following way: “37. In our view, Section 34(4) of the Act can be resorted to record reasons on the finding already given in the award or to fill up the gaps in the reasoning of the award. There is a difference between “finding” and “reasons” as pointed out by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent in the judgment in ITO v. Murlidhar Bhagwan Das . It is clear from the aforesaid judgment that “finding is a decision on an issue”. Further, ...
