OTS Archives - PLRonline.in

NIA S. 138 – Before summoning Magistrate is expected to examine the nature of allegations and proceed with proper application of mind – Strict compliance.

Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 – S.118, S.121 – Merely because instrument of partition was not drawn u/s 121 , could not be said that the partition was not completed. [ 2023 SCeJ 0211]

Child custody – Writ of Habeas Corpus, the doctrine of Parens Patriae, the doctrines of comity of courts, the doctrine of Parental Alienation Syndrome, citizenship of the child, and the paramount interest and welfare of the child. [PLRonline 481501 (SC), 2023 SCeJ 0170]

Various considerations that should be taken into account when determining child custody, such as the writ of Habeas Corpus, the ...

Children custody – Best Interest of Child – Scope of – Habeas Corpus – Children natural citizens of USA , are in the grips of their mother – Continuance of present status, will damage their progress in academics, and their emotional quotient. [(2023-1)209 PLRIJ 059]

Habeas Corpus Petition to secure the custody of his minor sons, who are naturalised American citizens, from the illegal custody ...

Licensing of Auction Platform Rules, 1981 – Market Committee – To do business in the shop and to carry on business on the auction platform, are both different and distinct . (2023-1)209 PLR 439 (SC)

Administrative Tribunals Act S. 25 – Matter involving the issue of territorial jurisdiction of the concerned High Court to decide a challenge to an order passed by the Chairman, CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi should be considered by a Larger Bench.2023 SCeJ 0048

Madras Bar Association v. Union Of India, 2021 PLRonline 9093

Supreme Court Of India L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta, S. Ravindra Bhat, JJ. Madras Bar Association v. Union Of India ...

Mathew Varghese v. M. Amritha Kumar

Mathew Varghese v. M. Amritha Kumar And Others, Supreme Court Of India Civil Appeals Nos. 1927-29 of 2014 10.02.2014 Krishnan ...

Mashyak Grihnirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit v. Usman Habib Dhuka, 2013 PLRonline 90004

PLR PLRonline 2013 PLRonline 90004 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Bench: P. Sathasivam, M.Y. Eqbal, A.K Sikri Mashyak Grihnirman Sahakari Sanstha ...

Babu Lal v. M/s. Hazari Lal Kishori Lal, 1982 PLRonline 0105 (SC)

PLR PLRonline 1982 PLRonline 0105 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (A. P. SEN,J. and R. B. MISRA,J.) Babu Lal v. M/s. ...

OTS – Delay in encashment of OTS cheque – On payment by cheque before the stipulated date, the Respondent was entitled to a 15% incentive as agreed upon

OTS - Proposal was accepted on payment of stipulated amounts on a stipulated date - The Bank had agreed ...

CrPC S. 439 – Whether a ‘victim’ as defined under Section 2(wa) of the CrPC is entitled to be heard at the stage of adjudication of bail application of an accused? Yes

[SC] Banking – OTS – The grant of benefit of OTS Scheme cannot be prayed as a matter of right

Banking – OTS - The grant of benefit of OTS Scheme cannot be prayed as a matter of right and ...

SARFAESI S. 13(2), (4) – Waiver – Borrower, aware and conscious of its rights, chose to abandon the statutory claim and took its chance and even procured favourable decisions

[SC] Banking – OTS – Such a decision should be left to the commercial wisdom of the bank whose amount is involved and it is always to be presumed that the financial institution/bank shall take a prudent decision whether to grant the benefit or not under the OTS Scheme

Banking - OTS - Commercial wisdom of the bank - The grant of benefit under the OTS is always subject ...

Service matter – Quantum of punishment in disciplinary matters – factors

[SC] Banking – OTS – No writ of mandamus can be issued by the High Court in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, directing a financial institution/bank to positively grant the benefit of OTS to a borrower.

Constitution of India, Art. 226 - Banking - OTS - No writ of mandamus can be issued by the High ...

OTS – If petitioners have not been able to make any payment ever since the proceedings under Sarfaesi were initiated in 2017 till 2021, the petitioners cannot get any relief from this Court on the basis of sympathy. 2022 PLRonline 5454

OTS - Petitioners having borrowed the loan, it was the duty of the petitioners to service the loan, and if ...

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 – S 2(dd), 13B, 18A – NRI

Sarfaesi S. 13(2) – OTS

Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interests Act, 2002 (54 of 2002) Section 13(2) – OTS ...

Tag: OTS