Tenders – Proportionate Joint Venture Experience Must Be Considered for Tender Eligibility
The Supreme Court held that a contractor who was a partner in a joint venture is entitled to claim proportionate ...
Tag: Judicial review
Right to Information Act – Duty of public authorities – Direct that the Central Information Commission and the State Information Commissions – Shall continuously monitor the implementation of the mandate of Section 4 of the Act as also prescribed by the Department of Personnel and Training in its Guidelines and Memorandums issued from time to time.
2023 SCeJ 345 2023 SupremeCourtOnline 456603 . Supreme Court of India Before: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI. , Justice Pamidighantam ...
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 28 – Lambardar – Appointment of – Age – Is a relevant factor . [PLRonline 119102]
2008 SupremeCourtOnline 0201 ; PLRonline 119102 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ( Before : S. B. Sinha, J; Cyriac Joseph, J ...
IBC S. 22 – Decision in regard to appointment of IRP as RP or replacement of IRP is a decision based on commercial wisdom of CoC which is not amenable to judicial review
2020 PLRonline 5206 (NCLAT) NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI Acting Chairperson [Justice Anant Bijay ...
Service matter – Compulsory retirement – At fag end of the career – Set aside.2023 SCeJ 0080, 2023 PLRonline 491600
LogIn to read FULL TEXT/ Download 2023 SCeJ 0080 = 2023 PLRonline 491600 = (2023-1)209 PLR 446 (SC) (SN)SUPREME COURT ...
Administrative Tribunals Act S. 25 – Matter involving the issue of territorial jurisdiction of the concerned High Court to decide a challenge to an order passed by the Chairman, CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi should be considered by a Larger Bench.2023 SCeJ 0048
LogIn to read FULL TEXT/ Download . 2023 SCeJ 0048 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ.) ...
Madras Bar Association v. Union Of India, 2021 PLRonline 9093
Supreme Court Of India L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta, S. Ravindra Bhat, JJ. Madras Bar Association v. Union Of India ...
Judicial review – Is not an appeal from a decision but a review of the manner in which the decision is made – Power of judicial review is meant to ensure that the individual receives fair treatment and not to ensure that the conclusion which the authority reaches is necessarily correct in the eyes of the court – The court/tribunal in its power of judicial review does not act as an appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its own independent findings on the evidence.
A three-Judge Bench has held that power of judicial review is not an appeal from a decision but a review ...
Judicial review – Departmental enquiry – High Court is not a court of appeal over the decision of the authorities holding a departmental enquiry against a public servant.
In the case of Nand Kishore Prasad , after considering other decisions of this Court on judicial review and the ...
Judicial review – Administrative orders – Interference with the decision of departmental authorities is permitted if such authority had held proceedings in violation of the principles of natural justice or in violation of statutory regulations prescribing the mode of such enquiry while exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Court held that interference with the decision of departmental authorities is permitted if such authority had held proceedings in violation ...
Service Law – Appointment – Educational qualification – Judicial review can neither expand the ambit of the prescribed qualifications nor decide the equivalence of the prescribed qualifications with any other given qualification Equivalence of qualification is a matter for the State, as recruiting authority, to determine
Service Law – Appointment – Educational qualification – Posts of Arts and Crafts teachers in State of Haryana - Diploma ...
P.K.Palanisamy v. N.Arumugham, 2009 PLRonline 0006
Supreme Court Of India Before: JUSTICE S.B. SINHA and JUSTICE DEEPAK VERMA P.K.Palanisamy v. N.Arumugham Civil Appeal No. 4643 Of ...
Tribunal or the High Court could not interfere with the findings of facts
Judicial Review Service matter - Once the evidence has been accepted by the departmental authority, in exercise of power of ...