IPC S. 420 Archives - PLRonline.in

Supreme Court: Deception Alone Insufficient for Cheating Without Dishonest Inducement Prosecution Must Prove Accused Made Forged Document and Had Requisite Mens Rea. ID 416860

October 22, 2025

(2025-2)217 PLR 737 (SC)(SN) = 2025 PLRonline 006 = ID 416860 2025-PLRonline-0061-1Download SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Present: Justice B.V. Nagarathna ...

[SC] Economic offences – Anticipatory bail – Cancelled. [PLRonline 419506]

by PLRonline

July 28, 2024

0

Criminal Procedure Code (2 of 1974), S.438 - Anticipatory bail – Economic Offences - IPC S. 420, 465, 467, 471 ...

Bail – Condition of deposit of amount as a condition of bail – Criminal proceedings cannot be converted into recovery proceedings – Order imposing the condition, set aside. [(2023-3)211 PLR 516 (SC)]

by PLRonline

October 11, 2023

1

(2023-3)211 PLR 516 (SC) SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Present : Justice Abhay S.Oka , Justice Pankaj Mithal . SHANE GEORGE ...

Rent – Fair rent – Provisional tent – Refund – Rent Controller can direct a refund if it finally finds amount found deposited to be in excess.

[SC] IPC S. 420 – – In the absence of any allegation of dishonest inducement it cannot be said that offence under Section 420 has been committted.

by Punjab Law Reporter

May 13, 2022

0

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860), S. 420 - Dishonest inducement - To make out a case against a ...

NIA S. 138 – Before summoning Magistrate is expected to examine the nature of allegations and proceed with proper application of mind – Strict compliance.

IPC S. 376, 420 R/W S. 34 – Rape and consensual sex.

by Punjab Law Reporter

January 2, 2022

0

IPC, Sections 376, 420 read with Section 34 - There is a clear distinction between rape and consensual sex - ...

IPC S. 376, 420 r/w 34 – Breach of promise to marry – If the accused has not made the promise with the sole intention to seduce the prosecutrix to indulge in sexual acts, such an act would not amount to rape

by Punjab Law Reporter

January 1, 2022

0

IPC, Sections 376, 420 read with Section 34 – “Breach of a promise and not fulfilling a false promise” – ...

CPA – Subsequent purchaser – Builder – Non delivery of flat – Is a consumer

Nonobstante clause – Statutory Interpretation

by PLRonline

October 4, 2021

0

Criminal trial Interpretation of Statutes - Statutory Interpretation - Settled principle of statutory interpretation that a clause or a Section ...

Judicial restraint – Practice of summoning officers , deprecated

Where an act or an omission constitutes for an offence under two enactments the offender may be punished under either or both enactment but was not liable to be punished twice for the same offence.

by PLRonline

October 4, 2021

0

Criminal trial IPC, Section 420, 408, 379 - Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 66 - if the special enactment in ...

FIR – Complaint already filed – Merely because on the same set of facts with the same allegations and averments earlier a complaint is filed, there is no bar to lodge the FIR with the police station with the same allegations and averments

by PLRonline

August 1, 2021

0

CrPC S. 210 - Merely because on the same set of facts with the same allegations and averments earlier a ...

Tag: IPC S. 420

Supreme Court: Deception Alone Insufficient for Cheating Without Dishonest Inducement Prosecution Must Prove Accused Made Forged Document and Had Requisite Mens Rea. ID 416860

[SC] Economic offences – Anticipatory bail – Cancelled. [PLRonline 419506]

Bail – Condition of deposit of amount as a condition of bail – Criminal proceedings cannot be converted into recovery proceedings – Order imposing the condition, set aside. [(2023-3)211 PLR 516 (SC)]

[SC] IPC S. 420 – – In the absence of any allegation of dishonest inducement it cannot be said that offence under Section 420 has been committted.

IPC S. 376, 420 R/W S. 34 – Rape and consensual sex.

IPC S. 376, 420 r/w 34 – Breach of promise to marry – If the accused has not made the promise with the sole intention to seduce the prosecutrix to indulge in sexual acts, such an act would not amount to rape

Nonobstante clause – Statutory Interpretation

Where an act or an omission constitutes for an offence under two enactments the offender may be punished under either or both enactment but was not liable to be punished twice for the same offence.

FIR – Complaint already filed – Merely because on the same set of facts with the same allegations and averments earlier a complaint is filed, there is no bar to lodge the FIR with the police station with the same allegations and averments

LATEST

Welcome Back!

Create New Account!

Retrieve your password

Save PLRonline.in APP!