Pleasure doctrine – Applicability – Nominated members continue only till the pleasure of the government – Municipality .
Pleasure doctrine - Applicability - Nominated members - Municipality
Pleasure doctrine - Applicability - Nominated members - Municipality
1. Ordinarily a litigant does not stand to benefit by lodging an appeal late. 2. Refusing to condone delay can ...
LogIn here to read full text Mansi v. State of Punjab, (2023-1)209 PLR 758 PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT Before: ...
Various considerations that should be taken into account when determining child custody, such as the writ of Habeas Corpus, the ...
Supreme Court Of India L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta, S. Ravindra Bhat, JJ. Madras Bar Association v. Union Of India ...
Supreme Court of India JUSTICE M.R. SHAH JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH DENTAL COUNCIL OF INDIA v. SAILENDRA SHARMA & ORS. CIVIL ...
equaltiy-and-equityDownload
Full text with judgments is available only for Subscribers.
PLRonline.in Subscription also forms part of the Punjab Law Reporter annual subscription @ Rs. 2800/- (limited time offer)
PLRonline subscription @ Rs. 2200/- . Call 9463598502
Click here for activating Trial Pack
Subscribers can take a print out of the FULL JUDGMENT by clicking on the “PDF” printer sign on the top right (above the judgment)