Indigent person – Motor vehicles Act. [1979 PLRonline 0002]
State of Haryana v. Darshana Devi, (SC) 1979 PLRonline 0002 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before:- V. R. Krishna Iyer and ...
Tag: Court Fees
Indigent person – Is only a provision for the deferred payment of the court fees and this benevolent provision is intended to help the poor litigants who are unable to pay the requisite court fee to file a suit because of their poverty. [PLRonline]
Application of Order XXXIII of the Code, principles : (i) It is an enabling provision for filing of a suit ...
Indigent person – Payment of court fees as the scheme suggests is merely deferred. It is not altogether wiped off. [PLRonline]
R.V. Dev v. Chief Secretary, Govt. of Kerala (2007) 5 SCC 698, in para 8 whereof it was observed : ...
Court Fee Act S. 16 – CPC S. 89 – Specific Relief Act S. 38 – Emphasize the legislature’s effort to settle cases through alternative dispute resolution mechanisms – Settlement – Refund of court fees even if not asked for. [PLRonline 318802 (P&H)]
2015 PLRonline 0207 (P&H) PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT Before:- Justice Bharat Bhushan Parsoon. Pradeep Sonawat - Petitioner Versus Satish ...
Suit for injunction simpliciter – Respondent is in possession – Proper remedy for appellant was to file suit for possession with injunction – Suit simpliciter for injunction, is not maintainable – Specific Relief Act S. 41 , Evidence Act S. 58. [2009 PLRonline 0015 (Del.)]
LogIn required to read Judgment 2009 PLRonline 0015 (Del.) DELHI HIGH COURT V.B.Gupta J. Davender Lal Mehta v. Sh. Dharmender ...
CPC O. 6 R. 17 – Mere failure to set out even an essential fact does not, by itself constitute a new cause of action.
CPC, 1908, O. 6 R. 17, O. 30 R. 1 - Amendment of plaint – Suit for recovery of money ...
Ganesh Trading Co v. Moji Ram, 1978 PLRonline 0101
PLR PLRonline . 1978 PLRonline 0101 SUPREME COURT (M. H. BEG,C.J.I. and D. A. DESAI,J.) M/s. Ganesh Trading Co v. ...
CPC S. 89 – Court fees – Is refundable wherever there is any settlement
CPC, Section 89 – S. 89 CPC shall cover, and the benefit of Section 69-A of the Tamil Nadu Court ...
Court Fees Act, Section 7(iv)- Valuation – Principles governing the valuation of the suits – Court, observed that the plaintiff’s assessment in such a plaint about the amount due to his share was a guesswork in the absence of any cogent material and would not constitute objective standard of valuation – Suits Valuation Act, Section 9.
Court Fees Act, Section 7(iv)- Valuation - Principles governing the valuation of the suits - Court, observed that the plaintiff’s ...
Court Fees – Valuation – Whimsical valuation
Whimsical valuation Mulk Raj Khullar v. Anil Kapur & Ors., (2013) 139 DRJ 303 referred and explained. High Court, ...
CPC O. 7 R. 11 – Suit valuation – Raised through application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC at the stage of cross-examination of the plaintiff – Application rightly rejected by the Trial Court.
CPC O. 7 R. 11 - Suit valuation - Raised through application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC at ...
COI Art. 226 – Ad valorem – Court fee – Plaintiff not being the executant to the transfer deed, is not liable to pay ad-valorem Court fee
Constitution of India, Article 226 – Ad valorem – Court fee – Plea -Respondent is a widow lady and claiming ...
CPC O. 7 R. 11 – Revision is not maintainable under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC where there was a claim regarding the joint possession in the family property.
CPC , O. 7 R. 11 - Revision is not maintainable under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC where there was ...
Court fees Act, 1870, Section 7(iv)(c) – Ad valorem – A suit for declaration that the sale deeds executed by the plaintiff’s father is null and void and for joint possession is not a suit for cancellation of the sale deeds and Court fees need not be paid on sale consideration
Court fees – Court fees Act, 1870, Section 7(iv)(c) - Ad valorem – A suit for declaration that the sale ...
Court fees deficit
CPC S. 149 - Section 149 raises a legal fiction in terms whereof as and when such deficit court fee ...
