MVA S. 163-A, S. 147 – Owner of vehicle died in accident – No third party involved – Insurance company not liable.
Supreme Court Of India S.B Sinha, Cyriac Joseph, JJ. New India Assurance Company Limited v. Sadanand Mukhi And Others Civil ...
Tag: Contract
Sea Customs Act, 1878, S.30 – Central Excise Rule, 1994, R.6(p)(i), R.6(p)(ii) – The most conservative price is to be taken into account while determining the value of goods. 2023 SCeJ 0077
LogIn to read FULL TEXT/ Download 2023 SCeJ 0077SUPREME COURT OF INDIA JUSTICE S. Ravindra Bhat , JUSTICE Dipankar Datta ...
Administrative Tribunals Act S. 25 – Matter involving the issue of territorial jurisdiction of the concerned High Court to decide a challenge to an order passed by the Chairman, CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi should be considered by a Larger Bench.2023 SCeJ 0048
LogIn to read FULL TEXT/ Download . 2023 SCeJ 0048 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ.) ...
IDA S. 25 F – Reinstatement – Lump sum monetary compensation – PLRonline 319601 (SC)
2013 PLRonline 0108 Supreme Court Of India K.S.P Radhakrishnan Dr A.K Sikri, JJ. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. Bhurumal Civil ...
Mathew Varghese v. M. Amritha Kumar
Mathew Varghese v. M. Amritha Kumar And Others, Supreme Court Of India Civil Appeals Nos. 1927-29 of 2014 10.02.2014 Krishnan ...
Insurance – Cancellation of – Cheque bounce – Liability of Insurance Company gets cancelled only when all concerned have been intimated about the cancellation of the insurance policy. (Del.)
PLRonline 314402 (Log In to read) 2011 PLRonline 0203, Delhi High Court A.K SIKRI, J. Paras v. Kamal Kishore ...
Insurance – Policy cancellation of – Liability – Cheque dishonoured (SC)
MVA S. 149(1) --- Policy issued on 8.11 --- Payment of premium made by cheque --- Third party accident the ...
Contract Act, S. 171 – Lien – Unless a person is a party to a loan transaction in whichever capacity, the question of the Bank’s exercising the general lien vis-à-vis the property of that person—even if he or she were the spouse of the contracting party does not arise
Put differently, it falls foul of the contractual obligations of the banker and customer - Question of the husband's implicitly ...
Partnership Act, 1932 – Bar of Section 69(2) – Suit, filed by an unregistered partnership firm – To attract the bar the contract in question must be the one entered into by firm with the third-party defendant and must also be the one entered into by the plaintiff firm in the course of its business dealings
Bar of Section 69(2) - Suit, filed by an unregistered partnership firm - To attract the bar the contract in ...
CPC O. 6 R. 17 – Court must not refuse bona fide, legitimate, honest and necessary amendments and should never permit mala fide and dishonest amendments
CPC O. 6 R. 17 - While deciding the application for amendment ordinarily the court must not refuse bona fide, ...
CPC O. 6 R. 17 – ‘due diligence’ – Fault of lawyer
CPC, 1908, O. 6 R. 17 - Amendment of written statement – 'due diligence' - Amendment application filed after commencement ...
Angoori Devi v. Smt. Satya Bhama, 2016 PLRonline 0104
2016 PLRonline 0104 Punjab and Haryana High Court Ajay Tewari, J. Angoori Devi v. Smt. Satya Bhama C.M. No. 2343-CII-2014 ...
CPC S. 10 – Rent Act – Rent is not required to go into the serious question of title – S. 10 is not applicable.
CPC S. 10 - Rent Act - Bihar Rent Act is a special Act providing for speedy disposal of eviction ...
Tender – A bid document has to be read as a whole and interpretation has to be based on common trade practices – Responsibility to make the site “available” prima facie has to be construed as “available” for work. PLRonline 437650
he language of the clause is wide and not limited to only an incident of default by the Department - ...
Sarita Devi v. Sultan Singh, (2021-3)203 PLR 368
LogIn required
