Limitation to file a suit for declaration is three years.
Limitation to file a suit for declaration is three years. Relevant portion from the said judgment reads as under: - ...
Tag: Cause of action
[SC] NIA S. 138 – Loan availed at P – In order to harass the petitioner, the cheque was presented in the banks Branch at C – Proceedings can not continue at C. [213 PLR 612]
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (26 of 1881), Section 138 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 406 ...
Insurance – Mediclaim policy – Pre existing disease – Non-disclosure – Burden of proof – Prescription – Mere mentioning in the prescription would not amount to establishing a concealment – Senior Citizens policy – Pre-medical check-up – Having opted to waive of was thus conscious – Insurer liable. [PLRonline # 446681]
No document produced by Insurance company to prove that claimant was suffering from any heart disease for last several years ...
CPC O. 7 R. 11 – Power is limited to rejection of the plaint as a whole or not at all – It is impermissible to reject the plaint only against one of the defendants – Sarfaesi. [PLRonline #348208]
Full Judgment with detailed headnotes access for Premium Subscribers only (Click to subscribe ) 2019 SCeJ 837, (2019-3)195 P.L.R. 230 ...
Banking – Forged DD – Liability of person presenting the same – Plaintiff Bank has passed the Demand Daft being received by way of collection by another bank – U/s 72 of the Contract Act, person receiving proceeds from forged draft liable to refund the money to the bank . [ID 317402]
2011 PLRonline 0206 (SC) Madras High Court Before: Justice R. Mala Titan Industries Ltd. v. State Bank of India, Appeal ...
Hindu Law – Family Settlement – Limitation – No period of limitation is prescribed for filing a suit for possession on the basis of inheritance. [ID 471672]
LogIn to read Full Text Hindu Law – Family Settlement – Limitation - In the absence of any evidence proving ...
SMT. S VANITHA V. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, 2020 SCeJ 2140, (2021-1)201 PLR 117 (SC)
2020 SCeJ 2140, (2021-1)201 PLR 117 (SC) SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before : Justice Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Justice Indu ...
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 – S.118, S.121 – Merely because instrument of partition was not drawn u/s 121 , could not be said that the partition was not completed. [ 2023 SCeJ 0211]
LogIn to read 2023 SCeJ 0211 Supreme Court of India Ajay Rastogi J. Bela M. Trivedi J. JHABBAR SINGH (DECEASED) ...
Indian Succession Act S. 63(c) – Wills, co-ownership of land, and the ability to seek possession or partition of agricultural land. [2020 PLRonline 5205]
Sucha Ram (since deceased) through Lrs v. Lachhman Dass, 2020 PLRonline 5205 The testimony of attesting witnesses is silent with ...
Jamia Masjid v. K V Rudrappa (Since Dead) By Lrs.
2021 PLRonline 9095 (SC), (2021)11 SCR 672 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud J ; Vikram Nath J ...
Suit for injunction simpliciter – Respondent is in possession – Proper remedy for appellant was to file suit for possession with injunction – Suit simpliciter for injunction, is not maintainable – Specific Relief Act S. 41 , Evidence Act S. 58. [2009 PLRonline 0015 (Del.)]
LogIn required to read Judgment 2009 PLRonline 0015 (Del.) DELHI HIGH COURT V.B.Gupta J. Davender Lal Mehta v. Sh. Dharmender ...
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 – S.24(2) – Possession of the land in question could not be taken by the authority due to pending litigation/stay – Affect of. [2023 PLRonline 9002 SC]
Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Manjeet Kaur , 2023 PLRonline 9002 Supreme Court of India JUSTICE M.R. SHAH, JUSTICE ...
Land Acquisition Act S. 12(2)- Once the notice under Section 12(2) of the LA Act was issued and served upon the original writ petitioner and he was called upon to collect the compensation and thereafter, when he did not come to collect the compensation and then the compensation was sent to the revenue deposit, thereafter it would not be open for the original writ petitioner to contend that acquisition proceedings have lapsed.[ PLRonline 413600]
Government of NCT of Delhi v. Dayanand, 2023 PLRonline 0002 = 2023 PLRonline 413600 Supreme Court of India JUSTICE M.R. ...
MVA S. 163-A, S. 147 – Owner of vehicle died in accident – No third party involved – Insurance company not liable.
Supreme Court Of India S.B Sinha, Cyriac Joseph, JJ. New India Assurance Company Limited v. Sadanand Mukhi And Others Civil ...
Limitation Act, Art. 58 and 72 – Suit for declaration, mandatory inunction and seeking direction to appellants to initiate and complete acquisition proceedings in respect of plaintiff’s land. (PLRonline 427601)
LogIn to read FULL TEXT/ Download STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH v. CHANDERVIR SINGH NEGI, 2023 SCeJ 0116, 2023 PLRonline 427601 ...
