Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1998 – S. 34 – Scope of Interference – Milling of Paddy – Public Policy .
M/s Vijay Rice and General Mills Ltd. & Anr. v. Punjab State Civil Supplies Corp. Ltd. & Ors.FAO-CARB-22-2025 (O&M), Decided ...
Tag: Arbitration S. 34
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 . S. 34, 37 – Interest – Non grant of – Since the arbitral award had not recorded a finding with regard to the contentious issue of interest, it qualifies as a patent illegality
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 . S. 34, 37 – Interest – Non grant of - Since the arbitral award ...
Arbitration Act, 1996 – Discretionary power conferred under Section 34(4)
38. In absence of any finding on Point 1, as pleaded by the respondent and further, it is their case that relevant material produced before the arbitrator to prove “accord and satisfaction” between the parties, is not considered, and the same amounts to patent illegality, such aspects are to be considered by the Court itself. It cannot be said that it is a case where additional reasons are to be given or gaps in the reasoning, in absence of a finding on Point 1 viz. “whether the contract was illegally and abruptly terminated by the respondent?”. *** 40. Merely because an application is filed under Section 34(4) of the Act by a party, it is not always obligatory on the part of the Court to remit the matter to Arbitral Tribunal. The ...
[SC] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, S. 34(2) – A court does not sit in appeal over the award of an arbitral tribunal by re-assessing or re-appreciating the evidence
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, S. 34(2) - A court does not sit in appeal over the award of an ...
Arbitration Act 1996 – S. 34 – Once the “Seat” has been chosen, it would then amount to an exclusive jurisdiction clause so far as Court of the Seat is concerned.
It has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that if both the parties have chosen the seat of arbitration ...
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, S. 34, 9, 20 – Having accepted the jurisdiction at New Delhi, now the appellant cannot argue to the the contrary – Objections could be filed in Delhi only.
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (26 of 1996) Section 34, 9, 20 - Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration ...
Arbitration – Enforcement of awards where the time to apply for setting aside u/s S. 34 has not expired
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 36(1) - Enforcement of awards where the time to apply for setting aside has ...