Motor Vehicles Act, – Composite negligence – Head on collision – No reason for the High Court to compel them to initiate fresh recovery proceedings against the second offending vehicle – High Court ought to have ordered the disbursement of the entire compensation to the claimants, with due protection of the right of the insurance company to have recourse, as may be available in law, for the recovery of the part of its liability from the driver/owner of the offending truck – Pay and Recover.
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
CPC O. 6 R. 17 read with O. 1 R. 10 - Application seeking impleadment of subsequent purchaser, as well as incorporating the necessary averments in the plaint - May not be a necessary party but cannot be said that the presence of the purchaser in the suit proceedings would be improper also. (PLRonline ID 46513)
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908) Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 - Property - Dispute with regard to identity of the property - Status quo - It would be appropriate for the parties to maintain status quo with regard to their possession. [PLRonline 417502]
[SC] Motor Vehicles Act, – Composite negligence – Head on collision – Only 50% amount awarded to the claimant by the tribunal as the other vehicle was not impleaded – High Court granted liberty to the appellants to file a separate claim for payment of the remaining amount – Set aside – Insurer liable to pay full amount and recover. [PLRonline 417503]
by
PLRonline
0
