Sarfaesi S.14, 17 – Constitution of India, Art. 226 – though appeal lies u/s14, however as respondent chose to challenge the decision of the magistrate by invoking the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 and he does not have any substantive objection, in the instant case would not be entitled to avail the remedy under section 17

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security interest Act (2002), S.14, 17 – Constitution of India, Art.226 – Order passed under S. 14 – Challenge under Art.226 of Constitution – No appeal filed under Section 17 – It would normally have been open to the respondent to prefer an appeal under section 17 raising objections regarding legality of the decision of the Magistrate….

read here

Subscribe to read full notes and judgment