Punjab Civil Services Rules (as applicable to Haryana), Rule 3.17 (A) – Pensionary benefits – Adhoc service – Directed to grant benefit of service, which the petitioner had rendered on adhoc basis to be counted as qualifying service for the grant of pensionary benefits – Non-grant of appointment on substantive post despite selection is attributable to the respondents and hence, the petitioner cannot be made to suffer for the inaction on the part of the respondents in not giving appointment to the petitioners for a period of four months despite being selected by the competent agency.
Punjab Civil Services Rules (as applicable to Haryana), Rule 3.17 (A) – Pensionary benefits – Adhoc service – Rule 3.17-A(a) – Rule provides that all the service interrupted or continuous followed by confirmation shall he treated as qualifying service and the period of break is to be omitted while working out aggregate service – If there is a break in service the same is to be ignored once, the petitioner got confirmed on the same post on which he was working on adhoc basis – Merely that the respondents had terminated his services before giving him appointment on the same post the break in service cannot be made a ground to decline the benefit of earlier service rendered by him on adhoc basis to be treated as qualifying service for computing his pensionary benefits as the same is to be ignored as for, interrupted adhoc service, benefit is to be extended.
Mr. Mayank Garg, advocate for Mr. Raman B. Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Middha, Addl. A.G., Haryana
