Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961, S. 45 – Rejection of fresh application under the Rent Act [SC]
Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961, S. 45 - Fresh application under the Rent Act could be summarily rejected only if ...
Rent Act – CPC, 1908 , Order 23 Rule 1 sub- rule (4) , would have no application in a proceeding initiated for recovering the suit premises on the ground of bona fide requirement which is a recurring cause. [SC]
Rent Act - CPC, 1908 , Order 23 Rule 1 sub- rule (4) - Would have no application in a ...
Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Section 28 – S. 28 of the Act permits the judgment-debtor to seek rescission of a contract and also permits extension of time by the Court but merely because rescission of contract is not sought by the judgment-debtor, does not automatically result in extension of time.
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 28 - S. 28 of the Act permits the judgment-debtor to seek rescission of ...
Rent act and CPC – Rent Act is a self-contained Code and the provisions of the CPC as a whole are not applicable to the proceedings under the Rent Act. [SC]
Subscribe to read full note / judgment PLRonline 216400
N. R. Narayan Swamy v. B. Francis Jagan, 2001 PLRonline 216400
PLR PLRonline 2001 PLRonline 216400 (005) Supreme Court of India M.B. Shah, R.P. Sethi N. R. Narayan Swamy v. B. ...
Specific Relief Act, 1963, S. 28 – Neither the said deposit was made within the stipulated time nor extension of time was sought or granted and also no explanation has been furnished for the delay in the making of the deposit – In an appropriate case the Court which passed the decree could extend the time as envisaged in the Specific Relief, 1963
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 28 - CPC, 1908, Order 20 Rule 12A - Shows that in every decree of ...
Prem Jeevan v. K.S. Venkata Raman, 2017 PLRonline 314002
LogIn required
Rent Act – Bona fide need – Is a recurring cause of action.[SC]
Rent Act – Bona fide need - Is a recurring cause of action - Eviction proceedings under the Rent Act ...
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 18-A(2) – Non compliance of – No prejudice is shown.
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section Section 18- A(2) – Non compliance of - Leave to contest sought ...
Jamabandi – Correction of entries – Revenue authorities are not competent to make correction of entries in jamabandi
Jamabandi – Correction of entries - Revenue authorities are not competent to make correction of entries in jamabandi as the ...
Co-owner in exclusive possession is entitle to protect his possession against forcible intervention by other co-sharers except in due course of law namely seeking partition of the joint land
Suit for Injunction - A co-owner in exclusive possession is entitle to protect his possession against forcible intervention by other ...
Tara Chand v. Siri Pal, 2019 PLRonline 3400
LogIn required
R.K.Sarin v. Baljit Kularia, 2012 PLRonline 0092
LogIn required
Rrent matter – East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 , Section 13-B, 18-A – Summons not issued in the proper format as prescribed in the Schedule II – Affect of
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 , Section 13-B, 18-A – Summons not issued in the proper format as ...
Pran Nath v. Avtar Singh, 2008 PLRonline 0106
LogIn required