Judicial restraint – It is time to reiterate that public officers should not be called to court unnecessarily
Judicial restraint - It is time to reiterate that public officers should not be called to court unnecessarily - The ...
Judicial restraint – Practice of summoning officers , deprecated
Judicial restraint - A practice has developed in certain High Courts to call officers at the drop of a hat ...
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH v. DR. MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA – (2021-3)203 PLR 253 (SC), 2021 SCeJ 978
2021 SCEJ 978Download SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before: Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice Hemant Gupta, JJ. THE STATE OF ...
ARAVALI GOLF CLUB v. CHANDER HASS – 2007 SCeJ 004
2007 SCeJ 004Download 2007 SCeJ 004 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before : Justice Markandey Katju, Justice A. K. Mathur, J ...
State of Punjab v. Khemi Ram – 1969 SCeJ 002
1969 SCeJ 002Download SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before : Justice Vishishtha Bhargava, Justice J.M. Shelat, Justice I. D. Dua, Justice ...
Service matter – Once an order is issued and it is sent out to the concerned government servant, it must be held to have been communicated to him, no matter when he actually received it
Question arose that whether the order of suspension was to be actually received by the employee to be affected. This ...
ANIL KUMAR MITRA v. GANENDAR NATH MITRA – 1997 SCeJ 004
1997 SCeJ 004Download SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before : K. Ramaswamy, J; G. T. Nanavati, J ANIL KUMAR MITRA AND ...
VENKATARAMAYYA v. TATAYYA – 1943 SCeJ 001 (Mad.)
1943 SCeJ 001 (MAd.)Download 1943 SCeJ 001 (Mad.) MADRAS HIGH COURT Before : Justice Krishnaswami Ayyangar, J MUKKU VENKATARAMAYYA — AppellantVersusMUKKU TATAYYA ...
Hindu Joint family – Reunion – To constitute a reunion there must be an intention of the parties to reunite in estate and interest
Hindu Joint family - Reunion - To constitute a reunion there must be an intention of the parties to reunite ...
R. JANAKIAMMAL AND S.R. SOMASUNDARAM v. S.K. KUMARASAMY(DECEASED). 2021 SCeJ 948
2021 SCEJ 948Download 2021 SCeJ 948 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before : Ashok Bhushan and R. Subhash Reddy, JJ. R. ...
Hindu Joint family – It is not necessary that there should be a formal and express agreement to reunite. Such an agreement can be established by clear evidence of conduct incapable of explanation on any other footing
Venkataramayya v. Tatayya , 1943 SCeJ 001 (Mad.) is a decision of a Division Bench of the Madras High Court. ...
After a partition the presumption would be against a reunion
Mayne’s Hindu law, 11th Edn., thus at p. 569: “As the presumption is in favour of union until a partition ...
General principle is that every Hindu family is presumed to be joint unless the contrary is proved; but this presumption can be rebutted by direct evidence or by course of conduct.
Court examined the principles of Hindu Law and principles of Hindu Joint Family. In paragraph 16, it was held that ...
Reunion is the reversal of the process of partition
Reunion is the reversal of the process of partition, following was held in paragraphs 8 and 12:- "8. The basic ...
Hindu Joint family – To establish reunion it is necessary to show not only that the parties already divided, lived or traded together, but that they did so with the intention of thereby altering their status and of forming a joint estate with all its usual incidents.
There was partition in the family in the year 1903 as a result of which the father with his second ...